Federal Court of Australia

Lewis on behalf of the Warrabinga-Wiradjuri People #7 v Attorney-General of New South Wales (No 3) [2023] FCA 353

File number:

NSD 857 of 2017

Judgment of:

BURLEY J

Date of judgment:

20 April 2023

Catchwords:

NATIVE TITLE -  interlocutory application by related body corporate of existing respondent to be joined as respondent - discretion under s 84(5) of Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) - where related body corporate had come into possession of assets within claim boundaries - where native title claim still in early stages - application allowed

Legislation:

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 66, 84

Cases cited:

Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Darlot Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2022] FCA 114

Wilson on behalf of the Wirangu People v South Australia [2022] FCA 829

Division:

General Division

Registry:

New South Wales

National Practice Area:

Native Title

Number of paragraphs:

11

Date of last submission/s:

14 February 2023

Date of hearing:

Determined on the papers

Solicitor for the Applicants:

Maddocks Lawyers

Solicitor for the One Hundred Twenty Sixth Respondent:

King & Wood Mallesons

ORDERS

NSD 857 of 2017

BETWEEN:

LEWIS & ORS ON BEHALF OF THE WARRABINGA-WIRADJURI PEOPLE #7

First Applicant

MAVIS AGNEW

Second Applicant

MARTIN DELAUNEY

Third Applicant

AND:

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW SOUTH WALES

First Respondent

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

Second Respondent

BLUE MOUNTAINS CITY COUNCIL (and others named in the Schedule)

Third Respondent

order made by:

BURLEY J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 April 2023

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.    Pursuant to s 84(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), Amplitel Pty Ltd as the trustee of the Towers Business Operating Trust ABN 75 357 171 746 be joined as a respondent party to the proceedings.

Note:    Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

BURLEY J:

1    By an interlocutory application filed on 18 November 2022, Amplitel Pty Ltd as the trustee of the Towers Business Operating Trust ABN 75 357 171 746 seeks orders that it be joined to the proceeding as a Respondent pursuant to s 84(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

2    The native title claim was filed on 29 May 2017, entered on the register of claims on 1 September 2017 and notified from then until 22 November 2018. The native title applicants oppose the application. Telstra Corporation Limited has been a party since May 2018.

3    Section 84(5) provides for persons who did not comply with s 84(3), by failing to notify the Court in writing that they want to be a party within the 3-month period after the notification day, as specified in s 66(10) of the Act, to apply to the Court to be joined as a party. Section 84(5) of the Act provides:

The Federal Court may at any time join any person as a party to the proceedings, if the Court is satisfied that the person’s interests may be affected by a determination in the proceedings and it is in the interests of justice to do so.

4    Section 84(5) requires that before joining a person as a party to the proceeding, the Court must be satisfied of the following three elements:

(a)    the joinder applicant has an interest (of the kind contemplated by s 84(5));

(b)    the interest may be affected by a determination made in the proceeding; and

(c)    it is in the interests of justice for the Court to order the joinder sought.

See Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Darlot Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2022] FCA 114 at [5] (Bromberg J).

5    Amy Carseldine, a solicitor at King & Wood Mallesons (which acts for Amplitel), gives evidence that Amplitel is a related body corporate of Telstra and that Telstra has undergone a structural reorganisation, one consequence of which is the transfer of ownership of its physical telecommunications assets that are located within the boundaries of the land and waters that are the subject of the present native title claim to Amplitel. Those assets include 18 main radio towers and 7 main radio towers and exchanges within the claim area.

6    In opposing the application, the applicants do not submit that Amplitel has no interest that may be affected by a determination made in the proceeding, but submit that it is not in the interests of justice that the joinder be permitted. They submit that there has been no reasonable explanation put forward that would justify a five year delay in seeking to join the proceedings, which would result in additional costs in serving documents on it and responding to it. They submit that the interests of Amplitel are already protected by the presence of Telstra as a party, which can make submissions on behalf of Amplitel, and that the joinder at this stage would be unfairly prejudicial to them.

7    Amplitel submits that a determination of native title rights and interests in favour of the applicant may affect the provision of telecommunication services via its assets. It submits that the interests claimed by Amplitel are not already protected by the interests claimed by Telstra, because of the transfer of the assets described above and because Amplitel and Telstra are separate entities.

8    In my view the applicants are correct to accept that Amplitel is a person whose interests may be affected by a determination in the proceedings. The real question in the application is whether any of the discretionary factors applicable in the context of the s 84(5) tend in favour of or against the joinder. In that respect, in Wilson on behalf of the Wirangu People v South Australia [2022] FCA 829, O’Bryan J said at [19]:

In assessing where the interests of justice lie, regard should be had, among other things, to the objects and purposes of the Native Title Act and the overarching purpose of civil practice and procedure expressed in ss 37M and 37N of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) which includes the just determination of disputes efficiently, in a timely manner, and at a cost that is proportionate to the importance and complexity of the matters in dispute: Kum Sing at [17]. A relevant consideration to the interests of justice is whether those seeking to be joined have provided a satisfactory explanation for any delay connected with their application and the prejudice that may be caused to existing parties to the proceedings if they are joined as a party: Barunga at [163] and [219] per Gilmour J; Jacob v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 1106 at [4] and [51] per McKerracher J; Allen on behalf of the Nyamal People #1 v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 320 at [56] and [75] per Barker J; Blucher on behalf of the Gaangalu Nation People v State of Queensland [2018] FCA 1369 at [23]-[27] per Rangiah J; Foster on behalf of the Gunggari People #4 v State of Queensland [2019] FCA 1300 at [9]-[12] per Reeves J.

9    Other factors that may be taken into consideration is whether the interest can be protected by some other mechanism; Harrington-Smith at [73]; whether the applicant for the determination would be significantly prejudiced if the joinder is granted and whether there has been any unexplained delay in bringing the proceedings; Harrington- Smith at [59].

10    In the present case, the reason for the late joinder application has been explained. Amplitel was not until recently the owner of assets within the claim area such that it could advance any interest. While it is true that the affidavit of Ms Carseldine does not, when it could (and should) have disclosed more specifically when the transfer of assets took place, I accept that the description given by Ms Carseldine indicates that a long period has not passed since the transfer. This has the consequence that Amplitel could not have applied to be a party during the notification period. As to prejudice to the applicants, it is likely that the additional costs arising as a result of the joinder are minimal. The same solicitors act for Telstra as well as Amplitel with the same address for service. It is difficult to see that any other form of prejudice will arise. Whilst the applicant submits that the joinder will occasion delay, it is far from apparent how that will arise. The applicant has not yet filed its expert connection report and the State has not undertaken its tenure analysis. In addition, the applicant has foreshadowed that the contents of its connection report may result in amendments to the claim itself.

11    In short, the regrettable fact is that despite being on foot since 2017, the claim is in its early stages. Amplitel has a clear interest in the proceedings. It is in the interests of justice that the application be allowed. I so order.

I certify that the preceding eleven (11) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Burley.

Associate:

Dated:    20 April 2023

SCHEDULE OF PARTIES

NSD 857 of 2017

Respondents

Fourth Respondent:

MID-WESTERN REGIONAL COUNCIL

Fifth Respondent:

DINAWAN DYRRIBANG UNCLE BILL ALLEN JR

Sixth Respondent:

LLOYD ATKINSON

Seventh Respondent:

EMMA MAY GRACE ATTKINS

Eighth Respondent:

BATHURST LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL

Ninth Respondent:

JUDY BELL

Tenth Respondent:

BRADLEY ROBERT BLISS

Eleventh Respondent:

PAUL WILLIAM BRYDON

Twelfth Respondent:

KIM MAY BURKE

Thirteenth Respondent:

WAYNE ALFRED CARR

Fourteenth Respondent:

ISABEL COE

Fifteenth Respondent:

LESLIE JOHN COE

Sixteenth Respondent:

LYNDA-JUNE COE

Seventeenth Respondent:

BRENDON JOHN COOK

Eighteenth Respondent:

HAYDON THOMAS CROOK

Nineteenth Respondent:

DEERUBBIN LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL

Twentieth Respondent:

YANHADARRAMBAL JADE WILLIAM FLYNN

Twenty First Respondent

BRIAN GRANT

Twenty Second Respondent

PETA SUSAN HOLMES

Twenty Third Respondent

KEITH KEMP

Twenty Fourth Respondent

KERRIE LEE LEWIS

Twenty Fifth Respondent

KEVIN SAMUEL MAYS

Twenty Sixth Respondent

KACIE MITCHELL

Twenty Seventh Respondent

MUDGEE LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL

Twenty Eighth Respondent

CLINTON NIX

Twenty Ninth Respondent

JAYLA NIX

Thirtieth Respondent

PAMELA NIX

Thirty First Respondent

ZAC NIX

Thirty Second Respondent

NSW ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL

Thirty Third Respondent

NTSCORP LIMITED

Thirty Fourth Respondent

JOHN THOMAS RILEY

Thirty Fifth Respondent

TREVOR ROBINSON

Thirty Sixth Respondent

ALEXANDRA MAREE ROSS

Thirty Seventh Respondent

CASSANDRA JAYNE ROSS

Thirty Eighth Respondent

SANDRA MAREE ROSS

Thirty Ninth Respondent

ZACHARY JOHN HENDERSON ROSS

Fortieth Respondent

GREGORY JOHN SMITH

Forty First Respondent

JASON SMITH

Forty Second Respondent

KAREN SMITH

Forty Third Respondent

NATLY SMITH

Forty Fourth Respondent

PATRICIA SMITH

Forty Fifth Respondent

ROBERT SMITH

Forty Sixth Respondent

STEPHEN SMITH

Forty Seventh Respondent

LATOYA TERRY

Forty Eighth Respondent

STEPHANIE TERRY

Forty Ninth Respondent

NORMA MARY THOMAS

Fiftieth Respondent

WANARUAH LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL

Fifty First Respondent

WELLINGTON VALLEY WIRADJURI ABORIGINAL CORPORATION

Fifty Second Respondent

BRETT JAMES WHYMAN

Fifty Third Respondent

DOROTHY FAY WHYMAN

Fifty Fourth Respondent

EDWARD CHARLES WHYMAN

Fifty Fifth Respondent

ROBERT HEWITT WHYMAN

Fifty Sixth Respondent

VANESSA FAY WHYMAN

Fifty Seventh Respondent

PETER HOWARD WIGHTON

Fifty Eighth Respondent

AARON JAMES WILLIAMS

Fifty Ninth Respondent

DALLAS JOHN WILLIAMS

Sixtieth Respondent

TAYLAH JADE WILLIAMS

Sixty First Respondent

TYSON JAMES WILLIAMS

Sixty Second Respondent

ZACHERY AARON WILLIAMS

Sixty Third Respondent

BIANCA JADE WILSON

Sixty Fourth Respondent

DANE JOSEPH WILSON

Sixty Fifth Respondent

DYLAN JAY WILSON

Sixty Sixth Respondent

KYLE JAMES WILSON

Sixty Seventh Respondent

VANESSA ELIZABETH WILSON

Sixty Eighth Respondent

RUSSELL KEITH DICKENS

Sixty Ninth Respondent

EMIRATES HOTELS (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED ACN 113 608 414

Seventieth Respondent

GREGORY LYLE HUNDY

Seventy First Respondent

JAMES WILLIAM EDWARD WALKER

Seventy Second Respondent

WARRUMBUNGLE SHIRE COUNCIL

Seventy Third Respondent

CENTENNIAL AIRLY PTY LIMITED ACN 078 693 722

Seventy Fourth Respondent

SHOALHAVEN COAL PTY LTD

Seventy Fifth Respondent

SITEGOAL PTY LTD

Seventy Sixth Respondent

WALKER QUARRIES PTY LTD

Seventy Seventh Respondent

JAMES BALLAS

Seventy Eighth Respondent

ANNE MARGARET BLAMEY

Seventy Ninth Respondent

CHRISTOPHER JOHN BLAMEY

Eightieth Respondent

LIONEL BRAITHWAITE

Eighty First Respondent

WILLIAM ARTHUR BROWN

Eighty Second Respondent

JANE BURSILL

Eighty Third Respondent

DAVID LEE CLARKE OF PH CLARKE & SON

Eighty Fourth Respondent

LEIGH JOHN DESREAUX

Eighty Fifth Respondent

HEATHER GEORGE

Eighty Sixth Respondent

ANTHONY GIBSON

Eighty Seventh Respondent

PETER RONALD GRIEVE

Eighty Eighth Respondent

ALAN LOVELL HEATH

Eighty Ninth Respondent

KD FOLPP P/L

Ninetieth Respondent

RACHELLE MCMAHON

Ninety First Respondent

RONALD CHARLES MILTON

Ninety Second Respondent

HENRY WILLIAM PEARCE

Ninety Third Respondent

LINDSEY PIGGOTT

Ninety Fourth Respondent

JOYCE MILDRED PURTLE

Ninety Fifth Respondent

GREGORY JAMES ROHR

Ninety Sixth Respondent

TIMOTHY JOHN ROHR

Ninety Seventh Respondent

DIANA LUCY RUTTER

Ninety Eighth Respondent

KEITH LAWRENCE RUTTER

Ninety Ninth Respondent

PAULYNE MAY SANDER

One Hundredth Respondent

ROBYN PEARL SMITH

One Hundred First Respondent

SALVATORE SPANO

One Hundred Second Respondent

AMANDA CAROLINE SEE STEWART

One Hundred Third Respondent

GAY SUMMERS

One Hundred Fourth Respondent

SUNTALA PTY LTD

One Hundred Fifth Respondent

MICHAEL ANDREW SUTTOR

One Hundred Sixth Respondent

ALLAN ALBERT WALES

One Hundred Seventh

WIDDEN STUD PTY LTD

One Hundred Eighth Respondent

RYLSTONE KANDOS ANGLERS CLUB INC

One Hundred Ninth Respondent

WALLERAWANG BRANCH OF THE CENTRAL ACCLIMATISATION SOCIETY

One Hundred Tenth Respondent

AUSTRALIAN RAIL TRACK CORPORATION ACN 081 455 754

One Hundred Eleventh Respondent

TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED ABN 33 051 775 556

One Hundred Twelfth Respondent

NSW ELECTRICITY NETWORKS OPERATIONS PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR THE NSW ELECTRICITY NETWORKS OPERATIONS TRUST ACN 609 169 959 (TRANSGRID)

One Hundred Thirteenth Respondent

COOYAL PARK RESERVE TRUST R120102

One Hundred Fourteenth Respondent

DUNEDOO SHOWGROUND TRUST RESERVE NO R83113

One Hundred Fifteenth Respondent

OLINDA PUBLIC RECREATION RESERVE TRUST

One Hundred Sixteenth Respondent

EVELYN MARGARET WATSON

One Hundred Seventeenth Respondent

LITHGOW CITY COUNCIL

One Hundred Eighteenth Respondent

WILPINJONG COAL PTY LTD

One Hundred Nineteenth Respondent

PEABODY PASTORAL HOLDINGS PTY LTD

One Hundred Twentieth Respondent

ULAN COAL MINES PTY LIMITED

One Hundred Twenty First Respondent

DUBBO LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL

One Hundred Twenty Second Respondent

MOOLARBEN COAL OPERATIONS PTY LTD (ACN 077 939 569)

One Hundred Twenty Third Respondent

YANCOAL MOOLARBEN PTY LTD (ACN 638 942 588)

One Hundred Twenty Fourth Respondent

MOOLARBEN COAL MINES PTY LIMITED (ACN 108 601 672)

One Hundred Twenty Fifth Respondent

STEPHEN BRET PARKES

One Hundred Twenty Sixth Respondent

AMPLITEL PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE OF THE TOWERS BUSINESS OPERATING TRUST ABN 75 357 171 746