FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People (Ngadju Part B) v State of Western Australia [2017] FCA 795

File number:

WAD 6020 of 1998

Judge:

GRIFFITHS J

Date of judgment:

17 July 2017

Catchwords:

NATIVE TITLE – consent determination covering part of the area of the native title determination application – whether proceedings affected by possible defect in authorisation – whether order should be made pursuant to s 84D(4) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – whether determination should be made – requirements of s 87 satisfied – appropriate to make orders

Legislation:

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 47B, 57, 61, 62A, 67, 84D, 87, 94A, 212, 225

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Order 30.01

Land Administration Act 1997 (WA)

Main Roads Act 1930 (WA)

Petroleum Pipelines Act 1969 (WA)

Public Works Act 1902 (WA)

Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914 (WA) s 26B

Titles (Validation) and Native Title (Effect of Past Acts) Act 1995 (WA) s 14

Cases cited:

Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Islanders of the Regional Seas Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 2) [2010] FCA 643; 204 FCR 1

Barkandji Traditional Owners #8 v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2015] FCA 604

Barunga v State of Western Australia [2011] FCA 518

Brown v South Australia [2010] FCA 875; 189 FCR 40

Cox on behalf of the Yungngora People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 588

Graham on behalf of Ngadju People v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 1455

Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 516

Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 700

Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 1247

Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474

Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People v State of Queensland [2001] FCA 1229; 115 FCR 109

State of Western Australia v Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People [2013] FCAFC 143

Yaegl People #1 v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2015] FCA 647

Date of hearing:

17 July 2017

Registry:

Western Australia

Division:

General Division

National Practice Area:

Native Title

Category:

Catchwords

Number of paragraphs:

44

Counsel for the Applicant:

Ms T Jowett

Solicitor for the Applicant:

Goldfields Land and Sea Council

Counsel for the State of Western Australia:

Ms C Taggart

Solicitor for the State of Western Australia:

State Solicitor’s Office

Solicitor for BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Ltd and St Ives Gold Mining Company Pty Ltd:

Ashurst Australia

Solicitor for City of Kalgoorlie – Boulder and Shire of Coolgardie:

Squire Patton Boggs

ORDERS

WAD 6020 of 1998

BETWEEN:

JOHN WALTER GRAHAM, BETTY BULLEN, AD (DECEASED), OLLAN DIMER (DECEASED), SONNY GRAHAM, KATIE RAY, GEORGINA SCHULTZ, JACK SCHULTZ, MABEL WILSON AND MAUREEN YOUNG ON BEHALF OF THE NGADJU PEOPLE (NGADJU PART B)

Applicant

AND:

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA, CITY OF KALGOORLIE-BOULDER, SHIRE OF COOLGARDIE, GOLDFIELDS LAND & SEA COUNCIL ABORIGINAL CORPORATION, BHP BILLITON NICKEL WEST PTY LTD, ST IVES GOLD MINING COMPANY PTY LIMITED, ARUBIDDY PASTORAL CO PTY LTD (ARUBIDDY STATION), CHILDARA PTY LTD (PODANA STATION), COMMONWEALTH HILL PTY LTD (RAWLINNA STATION), JARAC PTY LTD, JEMARKIM NOMINEES PTY LTD, MILEURA CATTLE CO PTY LTD, NORGATE NOMINEES PTY LTD, SYDNEY ERNEST POND, RED SUN NOMINEES PTY LTD, CHRISTOPHER RYAN SOUTH, MONICA MARGARET SOUTH, VANESK PTY LTD (VANESK STATION)

Respondents

JUDGE:

GRIFFITHS J

DATE OF ORDER:

17 JULY 2017

THE COURT NOTES THAT:

A.    The applicant in this proceeding WAD6020 of 1998 has made a native title determination application (the Ngadju Application) that relates to part of an area of land and waters which is the subject of a proposed determination of native title (the Part B Determination).

B.    The parties to the proceeding have reached agreement as to the terms of the Part B Determination which is to be made in relation to the land and waters covered by what has become known as the Ngadju Part B application in relation to land and waters covered by that application (the Determination Area). The external boundaries of the Part B Determination Area are described in Schedule 1 to the Minute of Proposed Orders and Determination of Native Title and depicted on the maps at Schedule 3 of the Determination.

C.    Pursuant to s 87(1)(a)(i) and s 87(1)(b) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (the Native Title Act) the parties hereby file with this Court their agreement in writing.

D.    Pursuant to s87 and 94A of the Native Title Act the terms of the parties' agreement involve the making of consent orders for a determination that native title exists    in relation to the Determination Area as provided by the Part B Determination.

E.    The parties acknowledge that the effect of the making of the determination is that the members of the native title claim group, in accordance with the traditional laws acknowledged and the traditional customs observed by them, should be recognised as the native title holders for the Determination Area as provided by the Part B Determination.

F.    The parties have requested that the Court hear and determine this proceeding in accordance with their agreement.

THE COURT BEING SATISFIED that a determination of native title in the terms set out in the Part B Determination in respect of this proceeding would be within power of the Court and, it appearing to the Court appropriate to do so, pursuant to s 87 of the Native Title Act and by the consent of the parties:

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.    Despite the deficiencies in the evidence concerning the authorisation of the applicant, the application for determination of native title should be heard and determined having regard to s 84D(4) of the Native Title Act.

2.    There be a determination of native title in the terms set out below. The Determination is to take effect immediately upon the making of a determination under s 57(2) of the Native Title Act.

3.    Within two months of the date upon which these orders are made, a representative of the common law holders of the native title rights and interest shall pursuant to s 57(2):

(a)    nominate in writing to the Federal Court of Australia a prescribed body corporate to perform the functions set out in s 57(3) of the Native Title Act; and

(b)    include with the nomination the written consent of the body corporate.

4.    In the event that there is no nomination within the time specified in order 3, or such later time as the Court may order, the matter is to be listed for further directions.

5.    There be no order as to costs.

DETERMINATION of native title

The Court orders, declares and determines that:

Existence of native title (s 225 Native Title Act)

1.    Native title exists in the Determination Area in the manner set out in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this determination.

Native title holders (s 225(a) Native Title Act)

2.    The native title in the Determination Area is held by the Ngadju People. The Ngadju People are the people referred to in Schedule 6.

The nature and extent of native title rights and interests and exclusiveness of native title (ss 225(b) and 225(e) Native Title Act)

3.    Subject to paragraphs 4, 5, 9, and 9A the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the Determination Area (other than the Exclusive Area) are that they confer the following non-exclusive rights on the Ngadju People:

a.    the right to hunt and fish (excluding commercial fishing), to gather and use the natural resources of the area, such as food and medicinal plants and trees, timber and ochre and to have access to and use of potable water;

b.    the right to live, to camp, to erect shelters and other structures and to travel over and visit;

c.    the right to do the following activities:

i.    engage in cultural activities;

ii.    conduct rituals or ceremonies;

iii.    hold meetings; and

iv.    teach the physical and spiritual attributes of places and areas of importance on or in the land and waters;

d.    the right to have access to, maintain and protect, places and areas of importance on or in the land and waters, including Dreaming sites, waterholes and ceremony grounds; and

e.    the right to share or exchange subsistence and other traditional resources obtained on or from the land and waters.

4.    Subject to paragraphs 5, 9, and 9A the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the Exclusive Area are that they confer the right to possession, occupation, use and enjoyment on the Ngadju People to the exclusion of all others.

Qualifications on the native title rights and interests

5.    The native title rights and interests set out in paragraphs 3 and 4:

a.    are subject to and exercisable in accordance with:

i.    the laws of the State and the Commonwealth, including the common law; and

ii.    the traditional laws and customs of the Ngadju People;

b.    do not confer exclusive rights in relation to water in any watercourse, wetland or underground water source as is defined in the Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914 (WA) (Rights in Water Act) as at the date of this Determination; and

c.    do not confer any rights in relation to:

i.    minerals as defined in the Mining Act 1904 (WA) (repealed) and in the Mining Act 1978 (WA);

ii.    petroleum as defined in the Petroleum Act 1936 (WA) (repealed) and in the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 (WA); or

iii.    geothermal energy resources and geothermal energy as defined in the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 (WA).

Areas to which s 47B of the Native Title Act apply

6.    Section 47B of the Native Title Act applies to disregard any prior extinguishment in relation to the land and waters described in Schedule 4.

The nature and extent of any other interests

7.    The nature and extent of the Other Interests are described in Schedule 5 and Schedule 5A.

Relationship between native title rights and interests and Other Interests described in Schedule 5:

8.    Except as otherwise provided for by law, the relationship between the native title rights and interests described in paragraphs 3 and 4 and the Other Interests set out in Schedule 5 is that:

a.    to the extent that any of the Other Interests are inconsistent with the continued existence, enjoyment or exercise of the native title rights and interests, the native title rights and interests continue to exist in their entirety, but the native title rights and interests have no effect in relation to the Other Interests to the extent of the inconsistency during the currency of the Other Interests; and otherwise,

b.    the existence and exercise of the native title rights and interests do not prevent the doing of any activity required or permitted to be done by or under the Other Interests, and the Other Interests, and the doing of any activity required or permitted to be done by or under the Other Interests, prevail over the native title rights and interests and any exercise of the native title rights and interests but do not extinguish them.

9A.    Relationship between native title rights and interests and Other Interests described in Schedule 5A

a.    To the extent that the Other Interests described at Schedule 5A cover areas of land and waters where the Ngadju People's native title rights and interests exist, those native title rights and interests are as described in paragraph 3 above.

b.    The Other Interests described at Schedule 5A do not cover areas of land and waters where the native title rights and interests described in paragraph 4 above exist.

c.    The relationship between the native title rights described in paragraph 3 above and the Other Interests identified in Schedule 5A is that to the extent that one or more of those Other Interests is inconsistent with the continued existence, enjoyment or exercise of those native title rights and interests, the Other Interest is invalid as against those native title rights or interests so that it does not affect the continued existence, enjoyment or exercise of those native title rights and interests.

Definitions and Interpretation

9.    In this determination, unless the contrary intention appears:

Determination Area” means the land and waters within the external boundary described in item 1.1 of Schedule 1 but not including the Unclaimed Area. The external boundary is generally shown as a solid blue line on the maps in Schedule 3;

Exclusive Area” means that part of the Determination Area described in item 1.2 of Schedule 1. This area is generally shaded pink on the maps in Schedule 3;

land” has the same meaning as in the Native Title Act and, for the avoidance of doubt, includes any natural collection of water found on the land which does not fall within the definition of “waters”;

Native Title Act” means the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth);

"Non-Exclusive Area" means those parts of the Determination Area which are not the Unclaimed Area or the Exclusive Area. This area is generally shaded orange on the maps in Schedule 3.

ochre” does not include ochres for use in the manufacture of porcelain, fine pottery or pigments which are minerals pursuant to the Mining Act 1904 (WA) (repealed);

Other Interests” means the legal or equitable estates or interests and other rights in relation to the Determination Area described in Schedule 5 and Schedule 5A and referred to in paragraph 7, as at the date of this determination;

Unclaimed Area” means the land and waters described in Schedule 2. This area is generally shaded green on the maps in Schedule 3;

underground water” includes water that percolates from the ground; and

waters” has the same meaning as in the Native Title Act.

10.    In the event of any inconsistency between the written description of an area in Schedule 1, Schedule 2, Schedule 4 or Schedule 5, and the area as depicted on the maps at Schedule 3, the written description prevails.

11.    In the event of any inconsistency as to the existence of native title rights and interests in an area of land and waters which is or was covered by interests that are listed in Schedule 2 and Schedule 4, Schedule 4 prevails.

Schedule 1

Determination area and exclusive area

S1.1    Determination Area

All those lands and waters commencing at the intersection of a southern boundary of Lot 227 as shown on Deposited Plan 238373, being a portion of Pastoral Lease N050166 (Mt Monger) with Longitude 121.936611 East, also being a point on the present boundary of Native Title Determination WAD6020/1998 Ngadju (WCD2014/004); Then southeasterly, southwesterly, generally southerly and generally southwesterly along the boundaries of that native title determination to the intersection with a eastern side of a road at Latitude 31.994916 South; Then generally northeasterly along the sides of that road to Longitude 120.795611 East; Then generally northerly, generally easterly and again generally northerly though the following coordinate positions:

LATITUDE (SOUTH)

LONGITUDE (EAST)

31.953761

120.795529

31.948954

120.795763

31.939793

120.794026

31.928800

120.790792

31.920041

120.790386

31.911255

120.791895

31.905209

120.796386

31.899761

120.806188

31.896209

120.818962

31.894849

120.831615

31.893783

120.841473

31.891576

120.848517

31.881104

120.856047

31.873073

120.857860

31.862008

120.859635

31.855076

120.861168

31.841932

120.862648

31.836112

120.867262

31.818088

120.872484

31.802220

120.874198

31.794117

120.875126

31.779616

120.875532

31.771522

120.875871

31.759795

120.876753

31.748488

120.877788

31.733035

120.879949

31.717433

120.880781

31.704262

120.882530

31.692275

120.883998

31.684898

120.887146

31.675803

120.892629

31.665619

120.897656

31.655610

120.900820

Then easterly to the northwestern corner of Reserve 17804; Then easterly along the northern boundary of that reserve to its northeastern corner; Then northeasterly to the westernmost corner of the northwestern severance of Lot 311 as shown on Deposited Plan 48599, being a portion of Reserve 4311; Then northeasterly along the boundary of that severance and onwards to the westernmost corner of the northeastern severance of Lot 311 as shown on Deposited Plan 48599, being a portion of Reserve 4311; Then northeasterly along the boundary of that severance to the intersection with the easternmost southeastern corner of Widgiemooltha Townsite; Then northwesterly along a northeastern boundary of that townsite to Longitude 121.582491 East; Then generally northerly through the following coordinate positions:

LATITUDE (SOUTH)

LONGITUDE (EAST)

31.486570

121.582491

31.482737

121.582491

31.479281

121.582491

31.477504

121.582491

31.475701

121.582491

31.423840

121.582490

31.423840

121.591991

31.399895

121.592002

31.398808

121.592002

31.392983

121.591991

31.387951

121.591991

31.385918

121.591991

31.384090

121.591991

31.380707

121.591991

31.375083

121.591991

31.374566

121.591991

31.355749

121.591990

31.326457

121.591990

Then westerly to the intersection of the western shore of Lake Lefroy with Latitude 31.326457 South; Then generally northerly along that western shore to the southernmost southeastern corner of the northern severance of Lot 13 as shown on Deposited Plan 48932; Then generally northerly, generally easterly, northerly, westerly and again northerly along the boundaries of that severance to the intersection with a southern boundary of Pastoral Lease N050022 (Woolibar); Then generally easterly along the boundaries of that pastoral lease to the intersection with a western boundary of Lot 227 as shown on Deposited Plan 238373, being a portion of Pastoral Lease N050166 (Mt Monger); Then southerly and easterly along the boundaries of that lot back to the commencement point.

Note:        Geographic Coordinates provided in Decimal Degrees.

All referenced Deposited Plans and Diagrams are held by the Western Australian Land Information Authority, trading as Landgate.

Cadastral boundaries sourced from Landgate’s Spatial Cadastral Database dated 28th February 2017.

For the avoidance of doubt the application excludes any land and waters already claimed by:

Native Title Determination Application WAD6020/1998 Ngadju (WCD2014/004) as Determined in the Federal Court on the 21st November 2014.

Datum:    Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994 (GDA94)

Prepared By: Graphic Services (Landgate) 20th June 2017

Use of Coordinates:

Where coordinates are used within the description to represent cadastral or topographical boundaries or the intersection with such, they are intended as a guide only. As an outcome to the custodians of cadastral and topographic data continuously recalculating the geographic position of their data based on improved survey and data maintenance procedures, it is not possible to accurately define such a position other than by detailed ground survey.

S1.2    Exclusive Area

The Exclusive Area, generally shown as shaded pink on the maps at Schedule 3, comprises all of the areas listed in Schedule 4 below, excluding all land and waters below the high watermark of the foreshore of the coastline including rivers, streams and estuaries that are affected by the ebb and flow of the tides.

Schedule 2

Unclaimed area

The following areas, being land and waters where native title has been completely extinguished, were excluded from the native title determination application and are excluded from the Determination Area.

All of the following areas are shown generally as shaded green on the maps in Schedule 3.

S2.1    Freehold

Current freehold

CT0166500089

CT0173200949

Historic freehold

CT0107000448

GT0002500126

S2.2    Vested reserves or reserves covered by public works

Current Reserves

Reserve No.

Current/Last Purpose

RES 03211

Conservation of Flora and Fauna

RES 04311

Water Supply Purposes

RES 07039

Water Act 57 Vic No.20

RES 08023

Water Act 57 Vic No.20

RES 17168

State Geodetic Infrastructure

RES 17804

Water & Conservation of Flora and Fauna

RES 17973

Water

RES 31717

Rubbish Depot Site

RES 32552

Conservation of Flora and Fauna

RES 51487

Railway Purposes

Historic Reserves

Reserve No.

Current/Last Purpose

RES 03211

Conservation of Flora And Fauna

RES 04311

Water Supply Purposes

RES 07497

Battery Site

RES 18001

Pipe Track

S2.3    Leases

Historical Leases

Lease No

Summary/General description of the Current/Last purpose

6566/153

Lease of a Town Lot or Suburban Lot

6679/153

Lease of a Town Lot or Suburban Lot

3117/2051

Lease of a Town Lot or Suburban Lot

1680/152

Collection and Manufacture of Salt

1703/152

Collection and Manufacture of Salt

1721/152

Collection and Manufacture of Salt

1744/152

Collection and Manufacture of Salt

1747/152

Collection and Manufacture of Salt

N288017

Grazing

3116/06724

Collection and Manufacture of Salt

3116/07439

Collection and Manufacture of Salt

S2.4    Dedicated roads and roads set aside, taken or resumed and associated features

Dedicated roads, roads set aside, taken or resumed or roads which are to be considered public works (as that expression is defined in the Native Title Act and the Titles (Validation) and Native Title (Effect of Past Acts) Act 1995(WA) (Titles (Validation) Act)), including the following:

Mapinfo ID

Road Description

CURRENT ROAD 091

Road No. 916 described in the Government Gazette 20/10/1899 p.3419

CURRENT ROAD 094

Road as marked on Public Plan 501115 (plan cancelled on 10/11/1961)

CURRENT ROAD 158

Section of Erin Street shown on Deposited Plan 222569

CURRENT ROAD 159

Section of Erin Street shown on Deposited Plan 222570

CURRENT ROAD 163

Section of Coolgardie-Esperance Highway shown on Deposited Plan 229320

CURRENT ROAD 168

Road No. 9358 described in the Government Gazettes 24/08/1934 p.1192 and 14/09/1934 p.1423

CURRENT ROAD 169

Road No. 9359 described in the Government Gazettes 24/08/1934 p.1192 and 14/09/1934 p.1423

CURRENT ROAD 171

Road No.6368 described in the Government Gazettes 24/12/1920 p.2301 and 07/01/1921 p.14

HISTORICAL ROAD 1

Road as marked on Public Plan 501120 (plan cancelled on 25/7/1927)

HISTORICAL ROAD 2

Section of Coolgardie-Esperance Highway as marked on Public Plan 501115 (plan cancelled on 10/11/1961) and subsequently designated as Lot 260 on Deposited Plan 40381

HISTORICAL ROAD 4

Section of Coolgardie-Esperance Highway as marked on Public Plan 501115 (plan cancelled on 10/11/1961) and subsequently designated as Lot 316 on Deposited Plan 42926

HISTORICAL ROAD 9

Road as marked on Public Plan 504378 (plan cancelled on 17/12/1971)

S2.5    Public works

The following public works (as that expression is defined in the Native Title Act and the Titles (Validation) Act:

Public Work

Location/Description

Railway (the area on which the railway and any associated infrastructure is situated)

Coolgardie – Norseman Railway

The part of the reserve on which the railway or any associated infrastructure is situated

RES 38183

Schedule 2A

General description of the location of Current Road 001 (as constructed)

All that land, being 20 metre’s wide and defined by the centerline commencing at the intersection of a southern boundary of Ngadju Part B with Longitude 120.905541° East and extending generally northwesterly and generally westerly along that centerline through the following coordinate positions:

LATITUDE (SOUTH)

LONGITUDE (EAST)

31.969450

120.902483

31.969275

120.901590

31.968950

120.900844

31.968460

120.900085

31.967993

120.899634

31.967751

120.899368

31.967218

120.898824

31.966733

120.898281

31.966403

120.897737

31.966229

120.897194

31.966016

120.894856

31.965006

120.882487

31.963775

120.865851

31.963189

120.858684

31.962853

120.854309

31.962558

120.850452

31.962189

120.840072

31.961879

120.829784

31.961626

120.828833

31.961415

120.827855

31.960365

120.822357

31.960169

120.811410

31.960035

120.801883

31.960025

120.798509

31.960065

120.797558

31.960195

120.796778

31.960443

120.796073

Then southwesterly to the intersection of a western boundary of Ngadju Part B with Latitude 31.960715° South.

Note:    

    Geographic Coordinates provided in Decimal Degrees.

    All referenced Deposited Plan and Diagrams are held by the Western Australian Land Information Authority, trading as Landgate.

    Road 1 Centreline digitised from interpreting the approximate position from aerial photography mosaic held by Landgate (DIAMOND_ROCK_3034_AUG_2010_ MOSAIC).

    Cadastral boundaries sourced from Landgate Spatial Cadastral Database (SCDB) dated 28th February 2017.

Datum: Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994 (GDA94)

Prepared By: Graphic Services (Landgate) 19th June 2017

Use of Coordinates:

Where coordinates are used within the description to represent cadastral or topographical boundaries or the intersection with such, they are intended as a guide only. As an outcome to the custodians of cadastral and topographic data continuously recalculating the geographic position of their data based on improved survey and data maintenance procedures, it is not possible to accurately define such a position other than by detailed ground survey.

Schedule 3

Maps of the determination area

Schedule 4

Areas to which s47B apply

Section 47B of the Native Title Act applies to the parcels of ‘unallocated Crown land’ (UCL) in the left-hand column of the table below, but for the portion that is/was overlaid by the tenure in the right-hand column, with the effect that any extinguishment by the creation of prior interests in relation to those parts of the Determination Area referred to below is disregarded:

UCL #

Overlapping tenure

UCL 012

 

NIL

UCL 612

(previously UCL 018)

 

NIL

UCL 609

(previously UCL 021)

 

M15/619

M15/641

M15/666

M15/680

M15/681

UCL 611

(previously UCL 025)

 

GML15/6597

GML15/7003

GML15/7038A

GML15/7049

M15/30

M15/44

M15/45

M15/46

M15/48

M15/76

M15/77

M15/88

M15/89

M15/94

M15/116

M15/601

M15/611

M15/693

M15/734

M15/739

M15/745

M15/782

UCL 610

(previously UCL 026)

 

M15/506

M15/580

M15/581

M15/619

M15/620

M15/629

M15/638

M15/639

M15/640

M15/641

UCL 606

(previously UCL 029)

 

NIL

UCL 030

 

NIL

UCL 031

 

M15/48

M15/88

M15/693

M15/698

UCL 042

 

NIL

UCL 043

 

M15/81

M15/90

M15/593

UCL 608

(previously UCL 044)

 

M15/045

M15/046

M15/077

M15/078

M15/079

M15/080

M15/081

M15/090

M15/593

M15/627

M15/641

M15/642

M15/666

M15/680

M15/681

M15/708

UCL 058

 

M15/081

M15/090

M15/335

M15/522

M15/593

M15/682

M15/683

M15/765

WATER 9

(previously WATER 1)

 

M15/615

M15/616

M15/617

WATER 8

(previously WATER 6)

 

M15/027

M15/028

M15/029

M15/366

M15/432

M15/452

M15/453

M15/494

M15/495

M15/756

ML15/137

ML15/138

ML15/139

ML15/145

ML15/146

ML15/147

ML15/148

ML15/155

ML15/156

ML15/157

ML15/158

ML15/159

ML15/160

ML15/161

ML15/164

ML15/165

ML15/166

ML15/167

ML15/168

ML15/169

ML15/170

ML15/171

ML15/172

ML15/173

ML15/174

ML15/175

ML15/182

ML15/183

ML15/184

ML15/264

ML15/268

ML15/269

ML15/271

ML15/272

ML15/273

ML15/274

ML15/275

ML15/276

ML15/277

ML15/278

ML15/279

ML15/293

ML15/295

ML15/297

ML15/298

ML15/299

ML15/300

ML15/301

ML15/302

ML15/303

ML15/304

ML15/305

ML15/306

ML15/307

ML15/308

ML15/309

ML15/310

ML15/311

ML15/312

ML15/313

ML15/314

ML15/315

ML15/316

ML15/317

ML15/318

ML15/319

ML15/320

ML15/323

ML15/324

ML15/326

ML15/327

ML15/400

ML15/401

ML15/402

ML15/404

ML15/405

ML15/406

ML15/407

ML15/408

ML15/409

ML15/410

ML15/413

ML15/414

ML15/415

ML15/416

ML15/418

ML15/419

ML15/420

ML15/423

ML15/425

ML15/426

ML15/427

ML15/428

ML15/429

ML15/430

ML15/431

ML15/432

ML15/433

ML15/434

ML15/435

ML15/436

ML15/437

ML15/438

ML15/439

ML15/441

ML15/442

ML15/443

ML15/445

ML15/446

ML15/447

ML15/448

ML15/450

ML15/451

ML15/453

ML15/454

ML15/455

ML15/456

ML15/457

ML15/460

ML15/468

ML15/469

ML15/533

ML15/534

ML15/535

ML26/129

Schedule 5

Other Interests

The nature and extent of the Other Interests in relation to the Determination Area as at the date of this determination are:

S5.1     Reserves

(a)    The following unvested reserves:

Current Reserves

Reserve No.

Last/Current Purpose

RES 04375

Cemetery

RES 09031

Common

RES 10305

Common

RES 10654

Water Act 57 Vic No 20

RES 10655

Water Act 57 Vic No 20

RES 10826

Water Act 57 Vic No 20

RES 10952

Recreation

RES 11057

Excepted From Sale

RES 11165

Methodist Church of Australia

RES 11692

Water Act 57 Vic No 20

RES 17169

Trigonometrical Station

RES 17938

Common

RES 17939

Battery Site

RES 31721

Water Supply

RES 32249

Cemetery

RES 38183

Railway Purposes

Historic Reserves

Reserve No.

Last/Current Purpose

RES 09031

Common

RES 10305

Common

RES 11057

Excepted From Sale

(b)    The rights and interests of persons who have the care, control and management of the reserves identified in sub-item 5.1(a) above;

(c)    The rights and interests of persons entitled to access and use the reserves identified in sub-item 5.1(a) above for the respective purposes for which they are reserved; and

(d)    The rights and interests of persons holding leases over areas of the reserves identified in sub-item 5.1(a) above.

S5.2    Pastoral Leases

The following pastoral leases and the rights and interests of the holders from time to time of those pastoral leases:

Pastoral Lease

Station Name

N050166

Mt Monger

N050231

Madoonia Downs

S5.3    Mining Tenements

(a)    The rights and interests of the holders from time to time of the following mining tenements under the Mining Act 1904 (WA) (repealed) and the Mining Act 1978 (WA):

(i)    Mining Leases

M 1500022

M 1500027

M 1500028

M 1500029

M 1500030

M 1500031

M 1500044

M 1500045

M 1500046

M 1500048

M 1500049

M 1500063

M 1500076

M 1500077

M 1500078

M 1500079

M 1500080

M 1500081

M 1500082

M 1500083

M 1500085

M 1500086

M 1500088

M 1500089

M 1500090

M 1500091

M 1500092

M 1500093

M 1500094

M 1500129

M 1500130

M 1500146

M 1500170

M 1500206

M 1500225

M 1500230

M 1500231

M 1500234

M 1500289

M 1500325

M 1500338

M 1500348

M 1500351

M 1500352

M 1500366

M 1500367

M 1500375

M 1500390

M 1500432

M 1500452

M 1500453

M 1500462

M 1500473

M 1500474

M 1500476

M 1500493

M 1500494

M 1500495

M 1500506

M 1500507

M 1500512

M 1500528

M 1500538

M 1500543

M 1500570

M 1500580

M 1500581

M 1500597

M 1500601

M 1500609

M 1500610

M 1500611

M 1500616

M 1500620

M 1500629

M 1500634

M 1500635

M 1500639

M 1500640

M 1500642

M 1500665

M 1500667

M 1500668

M 1500680

M 1500681

M 1500682

M 1500683

M 1500684

M 1500685

M 1500693

M 1500698

M 1500734

M 1500745

M 1500757

M 1500758

M 1500786

M 1500817

M 1500820

M 1500882

M 1500883

M 1500884

M 1500907

M 1500925

M 1501226

M 1501227

M 1501423

M 1501431

M 1501457

M 1501458

M 1501459

M 1501476

M 1501481

M 1501790

M 1501792

M 2600317

M 2600491

M 2600514

M 1501501

M 1501502

M 1501503

M 1501504

M 1501507

M 1501508

M 1501509

M 1501510

M 1501512

M 1501513

M 1501514

M 1501515

M 1501516

M 1501517

M 1501518

M 1501519

M 1501520

M 1501521

M 1501522

M 1501523

M 1501524

M 1501525

M 1501526

M 1501527

M 1501761

M 1501762

M 1501763

M 1501529

M 1501530

M 1501531

M 1501540

M 1501541

M 1501542

M 1501543

M 1501544

M 1501545

M 1501546

M 1501547

M 1501548

M 1501549

M 1501550

M 1501551

M 1501552

M 1501553

M 1501554

M 1501555

M 1501556

M 1501557

M 1501558

M 1501559

M 1501560

M 1501561

M 1501562

M 1501563

M 1501564

M 1501565

M 1501566

M 1501567

M 1501568

M 1501569

M 1501570

M 1501571

M 1501572

M 1501573

M 1501574

M 1501575

M 1501576

M 1501577

M 1501578

M 1501579

M 1501580

M 1501581

M 1501582

M 1501583

M 1501584

M 1501585

M 1501586

M 1501587

M 1501588

M 1501589

M 1501590

M 1501591

M 1501593

M 1501594

M 1501597

M 1501598

M 1501599

M 1501600

M 1501601

M 1501602

M 1501603

M 1501604

M 1501605

M 1501606

M 1501607

M 1501608

M 1501609

M 1501610

M 1501611

M 1501612

M 1501613

M 1501614

M 1501615

M 1501616

M 1501617

M 1501618

M 1501619

M 1501620

M 1501621

M 1501622

M 1501623

M 1501624

M 1501625

M 1501626

M 1501627

M 1501628

M 1501629

M 1501630

M 1501631

M 1501632

M 1501633

M 1501634

M 1501635

M 1501653

M 1501654

M 1501655

M 1501656

M 1501657

M 1501658

M 1501659

M 1501660

M 1501661

M 1501662

M 1501663

M 1501664

M 1501665

M 1501666

M 1501667

M 1501668

M 1501669

M 1501670

M 1501671

M 1501672

M 1501673

M 1501674

M 1501675

M 1501676

M 1501677

M 1501678

M 1501679

M 1501680

M 1501681

M 1501682

M 1501683

M 1501684

M 1501685

M 1501686

M 1501687

M 1501688

M 1501689

M 1501690

M 1501691

M 1501692

M 1501693

M 1501694

M 1501695

M 1501696

M 1501697

M 1501698

M 1501699

M 1501700

M 1501701

M 1501702

M 1501703

M 1501704

M 1501705

M 1501708

M 1501709

(ii)    Mineral Leases

ML 15/485

ML 15/508

ML 15/509

ML 15/510

ML 15/511

ML 15/512

ML 15/513

ML 15/514

ML 15/515

ML 15/516

ML 15/517

ML 15/518

ML 15/519

ML 15/520

ML 15/521

ML 15/522

ML 15/523

ML 15/524

ML 15/525

ML 15/526

ML 15/527

ML 15/528

ML 15/529

ML 15/530

ML 15/531

ML 15/532

ML 15/533

ML 15/534

ML 15/535

(iii)    Miscellaneous Licences

L 1500143

L 1500144

L 1500145

L 1500146

L 1500147

L 1500148

L 1500160

L 1500162

L 1500163

L 1500178

L 1500191

L 1500233

L 1500235

L 1500238

L 1500239

L 1500240

L 1500241

L 1500242

L 1500243

L 1500244

L 1500245

L 1500247

L 1500250

L 1500256

L 1500257

L 1500259

L 1500261

L 1500272

L 1500279

L 1500282

L 1500288

L 1500298

L 1500302

L 1500308

L 1500322

L 1500341

L 1500346

L 1500347

L 2600178

(iv)    General Purpose Leases

G 1500019

G 1500022

G 1500023

G 1500026

G 1500027

G 1500029

(v)    Exploration Licences

E 1500786

E 1500808

E 1500809

E 1500812

E 1500828

E 1500949

E 1500970

E 1500975

E 1500976

E 1500977

E 1500978

E 1500980

E 1500989

E 1501010

E 1501059

E 1501060

E 1501094

E 1501117

E 1501130

E 1501167

E 1501197

E 1501223

E 1501248

E 1501260

E 1501262

E 1501304

E 6301071

E 1501355

E 1501356

E 1501357

E 1501358

E 1501359

E 1501365

E 1501366

E 1501391

E 1501393

E 1501418

E 1501432

E 1501439

E 1501440

E 1501442

E 1501447

E 1501449

E 1501461

E 1501469

E 1501471

E 1501488

E 1501490

E 1501491

E 1501505

E 1501514

E 1501522

E 1501551

E 2600166

E 2600184

E 6301669

(vi)    Prospecting Licences

P 1504753

P 1504754

P 1504789

P 1504906

P 1504907

P 1505390

P 1505391

P 1505393

P 1505429

P 1505430

P 1505431

P 1505432

P 1505433

P 1505434

P 1505435

P 1505437

P 1505438

P 1505439

P 1505500

P 1505501

P 1505531

P 1505534

P 1505543

P 1505561

P 1505645

P 1505665

P 1505666

P 1505667

P 1505668

P 1505716

P 1505769

P 1505770

P 1505781

P 1505805

P 1505806

P 1505886

P 1505911

P 1505933

P 1505934

P 1505945

P 1505959

P 1505960

P 1505961

P 1505978

P 1505988

P 1505999

P 1506000

P 1506001

P 1506005

P 1506063

P 2603889

P 2603890

P 2603891

S5.4    Roads

The following roads and the right of a member of the public to use those roads:

Mapinfo ID

Road Description

ROAD 041

Cave Hill North Road, shown as Lot 214 on Deposited Plan 36250

ROAD 042

Section of Coolgardie-Esperance Highway, shown as Lot 304 on Deposited Plan 40376

ROAD 043

Section of Coolgardie-Esperance Highway, shown as Lot 305 on Deposited Plan 40377

ROAD 044

Section of Coolgardie-Esperance Highway, shown as Lot 306 on Deposited Plan 40378

ROAD 045

Section of Coolgardie-Esperance Highway, shown as Lot 307 on Deposited Plan 40379

ROAD 046

Section of Coolgardie-Esperance Highway, shown as Lot 308 on Deposited Plan 40380

ROAD 047

Section of Coolgardie-Esperance Highway, shown as Lot 309 on Deposited Plan 40381

ROAD 048

Section of Coolgardie-Esperance Highway, shown as Lot 310 on Deposited Plan 40382

ROAD 052

Section of Coolgardie-Esperance Highway, shown as portion of Lot 317 on Deposited Plan 42926

S5.5    Petroleum Pipeline

The rights and interests of the holder from time to time of pipeline licence PL 59 under the Petroleum Pipelines Act 1969 (WA).

S5.6    Water Interests

(a)    The following licences granted pursuant to the Rights in Water Act and the rights and interests of the holders from time to time of those licences, which do not extinguish native title:

(i)    Licences to take groundwater (section 5C):

GWL 165489(3)

GWL 154213(4)

GWL 171060(1)

GWL 62505(8)

GWL 160795(5)

GWL 172696(2)

GWL 151344(5)

(ii)    Licences to construct or alter wells (section 26D):

CAW 180899(1)

CAW 179401(1)

(b)    The Goldfields Groundwater Area Proclamation, proclaimed on 20 November 1990 under section 26B of the Rights in Water Act, and the rights and interests comprised in, conferred under or in accordance with that proclamation.

S5.7    Material Pits

(a)    The following material pits located near the Coolgardie-Esperance Highway and the rights and interests therein of employees, agents or instrumentalities of the State by reason of the force and operation of the laws of the State, including but not limited to the Land Administration Act 1997 (WA), the Public Works Act 1902 (WA) and the Main Roads Act 1930 (WA):

Straight line kilometres from start of highway

Side of highway

(left/right)

Offset from highway (in meters)

Latitude

Longitude

Approximate area of pit (in hectares)

124

RHS

3000

-31.845208

121.6144257

11.6

74.36

RHS

15000

-31.583947

121.451944

90

-31.5939

121.463331

-31.577997

121.46615

-31.592119

121.470908

S5.8    Other

The following rights and interests:

(a)    Valid or validated rights and interests, including licences and permits, granted by the Crown in right of the State or of the Commonwealth pursuant to statute or otherwise in the exercise of its executive power and any regulations made pursuant to such legislation.

(b)    Valid or validated rights or interests held by reason of the force and operation of the laws of the State or of the Commonwealth, including but not limited to, the force and operation of the Rights in Water Act and the Land Administration Act 1997 (WA).

(c)    The right to access the Determination Area by:

(i)     an employee, agent or instrumentality of the State;

(ii)     an employee, agent or instrumentality of the Commonwealth;

(iii)     an employee, agent or instrumentality of any local government or other statutory authority;

as required and permitted by law in the performance of his or her statutory or common law duty.

(d)    So far as confirmed pursuant to s 212(2) of the Native Title Act and s 14 of the Titles (Validation) Act, any then existing public access to, and enjoyment of, the following places in the Determination Area:

(i)     waterways;

(ii)     beds and banks or foreshores of waterways;

(iii)     coastal waters;

(iv)     beaches;

(v)     stock routes; and

(vi)     areas that were public places at the end of 30 June 1995.

(e)     Rights and interests of members of the public arising under the common law including but not limited to:

(i)    the public right to fish in such areas and circumstances as that right exists at common law;

(ii)    the public right to navigate in such areas and circumstances as that right exists at common law;

(iii)    the right of any person to use any road in the Determination Area, subject to the laws of the State, over which, from time to time, members of the public have a right of access under common law.

Schedule 5A

(1)    Mining Leases

M 1500748

Schedule 6

Native Title Holders

The Ngadju People are those Aboriginal persons who are:

(1)    the biological descendants of one or more of the following apical ancestors:

a)    Belang (Bilanj, @Jinny);

b)    Minnie and Tuumi;

c)    Karitjabana and Ngilinj;

d)    Kakaanj;

e)    Mary Kuuban (Kuubanj);

f)    Djurdilj and Djalbulj;

g)    Djaruptjal and Tjupu;

h)    Diamond and Lucy;

i)    Linesman Jacob;

j)    Wicker (Wika);

k)    Peter Flynn;

l)    Maggie and Jumbo; and

m)    Polly Raylinya.

(2)    those persons adopted by the biological descendants in accordance with Ngadju tradition and custom.

[Adoption, under Ngadju tradition and custom, refers to the situation where a child is ‘grown up’ by a relative or someone without a biological relationship, either because they have been ‘gifted’ to them, or left in their care, as the biological parents are not in a position to care for them. This applies regardless of whether or not the child has been formally adopted under the non-Aboriginal legal system.]

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1    Today, the Court will make orders by consent which recognise that the Ngadju People have, and always have had, native title rights and interests in land within the area the subject of this Determination. The land is situated approximately half way between Kalgoorlie and Norseman in Western Australia.

2    It is desirable to say something first about the Native Title Act (1993) (Cth) (the Act). As Jagot J noted in Barkandji Traditional Owners #8 v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2015] FCA 604, the Act takes a relatively rare form. In particular, the Preamble to the Act leaves little or no doubt as to why the Act was enacted and the objectives it was intended to achieve. Relevant parts of the Preamble include as follows:

The people whose descendants are now known as Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islanders were the inhabitants of Australia before European settlement.

They have been progressively dispossessed of their lands. This dispossession occurred largely without compensation, and successive governments have failed to reach a lasting and equitable agreement with Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islanders concerning the use of their lands.

As a consequence, Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islanders have become, as a group, the most disadvantaged in Australian society.

The people of Australia intend:

(a)    to rectify the consequences of past injustices by the special measures contained in this Act, announced at the time of introduction of this Act into the Parliament, or agreed on by the Parliament from time to time, for securing the adequate advancement and protection of Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islanders; and

(b)    to ensure that Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islanders receive the full recognition and status within the Australian nation to which history, their prior rights and interests, and their rich and diverse culture, fully entitle them to aspire.

A special procedure needs to be available for the just and proper ascertainment of native title rights and interests which will ensure that, if possible, this is done by conciliation and, if not, in a manner that has due regard to their unique character.

3    The Act is significant because it creates a special procedure for the just and proper ascertainment of native title rights and interests so as to ensure that, wherever possible, those rights and interests be established by conciliation rather than by contested, lengthy and expensive litigation. The value of the procedure for the making of a consent determination under s 87 is vividly illustrated by this case when regard is had to the protracted litigation which led to the making of what is known as the Ngadju Part A Determination. As will be explained further shortly, the current determination relates to land which forms part of the original application for determination of native title but which was carved out from the land the subject of the Ngadju Part A Determination. The current proceeding relates to the Ngadju Part B Determination.

4    I congratulate the parties in this proceeding for having finalised proposed orders by consent.

5    It is appropriate to now set out some uncontroversial background matters. It is appropriate to warn Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people that this document contains names and material about deceased persons.

Summary of background matters

6    This matter has a long history. That history is set out in part in an affidavit dated 3 July 2017 by Mr Mark Rumler, who is a solicitor for the applicant.

7    The current proceeding is a combination of two earlier native title claims made on behalf of the Ngadju People and which have been before the Court since 1995. A very small portion of the Ngadju application area, approximately 4%, was overlapped by two other native title claim claims, WAD 6216 of 1998 and WAD 6243 of 1998. On 9 December 2011, the Court made orders under s 67 of the Act that that part of the Ngadju application area that did not overlap geographically with WAD 6216 of 1998 or with WAD 6243 of 1998 would be referred to as the "Ngadju Trial Area proceeding" and that the hearing of the Ngadju Trial Area proceeding would commence in Perth on 7 May 2012. This ultimately resulted in the making of the Ngadju Part A Determination in April 2016, but only after protracted litigation at the level of the Federal Court, the Full Court of the Federal Court and the High Court of Australia.

8    In December 2004, the Court (Marshall J) heard preservation evidence on country. The following Aboriginal witnesses gave evidence:

(a)    Ollan Dimer (now deceased);

(b)    Dorothy Dimer (now deceased);

(c)    Johnny Graham;

(d)    Jack Schultz (now deceased); and

(e)    Sonny Graham.

9    In June 2009, the Court heard further preservation and other evidence on country. The following Aboriginal witnesses gave evidence:

(a)    John Walter (Danny) Graham;

(b)    Stephen Reginald Rule;

(c)    Aaron James Rule;

(d)    Phyllis Wicker ;

(e)    Valma Joy Schultz; and

(f)    Adrian John Schultz.

10    On 30 July 2009, the applicant filed and served its expert anthropologist's report entitled Further Anthropologist's Report prepared by Dr Kingsley Palmer. That report was reviewed and responded to by the State's expert anthropologist, Professor Basil Sansom. During this time, the proceeding remained in mediation until 24 March 2011 at which time the mediation ceased without resolution.

11    In May 2012 a final tranche of evidence was heard in the Ngadju Trial Area proceeding. The following Aboriginal witnesses gave evidence in that tranche:

(a)    Leslie Schultz;

(b)    Rule Johnson Wicker;

(c)    James Schultz; and

(d)    Justin Scott Graham.

12    During that tranche the Court also heard evidence from the following expert witnesses:

(a)    Dr Debra Ann Fletcher (historian);

(b)    Professor Sansom and Dr Palmer (anthropologists who gave concurrent evidence); and

(c)    Professor Veth (archaeologist).

13    On 27 August 2012, Marshall J gave judgment in respect of three interlocutory applications brought by individuals who sought to be joined as respondents (see Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 1003).

14    The Court amended its earlier programming orders on 24 September 2012 and made an order under Order 30.01 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 that the following question be decided separately and in advance of any other question in the proceeding:

But for any question of extinguishment of native title by acts carried out pursuant to the authority of the legislature to which Divisions 2, 2A, 2B or 3 of Part 2 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) or the Titles Validation and Native Title (Effect of Past Acts) Act 1995 (WA) applies, and the determination of matters required by s 225(c), (d) and (e) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth):

(i)    does native title exist in relation to land and waters in the area of the Ngadju Trial Area proceeding ;

(ii)    if the answer to (i) above is the in affirmative, who are the persons or each group of persons holding the common or group rights comprising the native title; and

(iii)    what is the extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the area?

15    The Court’s decision on the separate question was delivered on 21 December 2012 (see Graham on behalf of Ngadju People v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 1455 (Graham No 2)). An appeal against that judgment, brought by the State of Western Australia, was allowed in part on 27 November 2013 (see State of Western Australia v Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People [2013] FCAFC 143 (Graham Full Court No 1)). The Full Court dismissed 3 of the 4 grounds of appeal advanced by the State, but allowed the remaining ground, resulting in the removal of one of the apical ancestors from the description of the native title holders.

16    Programming orders were also made regarding extinguishment issues in relation to the Ngadju Trial Area proceeding. Those issues were the subject of two judgments dated 21 May 2014 and 3 July 2014 respectively (see Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 516 and Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 700) with additional orders regarding the content of the determination being made on 12 November 2014. A determination of native title was made by Marshall J in relation to the Ngadju Trial Area on 21 November 2014 at Norseman: Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 1247 (Graham No 5). The Full Court heard various appeals and cross appeals from those three decisions.

17    On 20 April 2016, the Ngadju Trial Area proceeding was finally determined by order of the Full Court, which varied the determination made on 21 November 2014 in Graham, and gave effect to the Full Court's reasons for judgment published on 29 March 2016 in State of Western Australia v Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People [2016] FCAFC 47 (Graham Full Court No 2), which gave rise to the Part A Determination. The variations made by the Full Court to the earlier determination related to the validity of certain mining tenements. The description of the native title holders and of the native title rights and interests were unchanged.

18    An application for special leave to appeal to the High Court from Graham Full Court No 2 was refused in October 2016.

Overview of the current application

19    The Part A Determination did not concern all of the area covered by proceeding WAD 6020 of 1998. At [1] of Graham No 5, Marshall J referred to the area that was not included in the Ngadju Trial Area proceeding, namely that part of the Ngadju claim area that did not overlap with the now dismissed WAD 6216/1998 (the Kalamai Kabu(d)n Native Title Application).

20    This Ngadju Part B Determination covers the area that was not included in the Ngadju Trial Area proceeding and was therefore not determined on 20 April 2016 as part of the Ngadju Part A Determination.

Prescribed Body Corporate (PBC)

21    On 12 November 2015, Barker J made the following orders pursuant to s 56 of the Act in respect of the Part A Determination:

(1)    The Court determines native title determined in the Ngadju Trial Area proceeding on 21 November 2014 is not held on trust.

(2)    The Court determines for native title determined in the Ngadju Trial Area proceeding on 21 November 2014 that Ngadju Native Title Aboriginal Corporation ICN 8297, registered under the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Cth), is to:

(a)    be the prescribed body corporate for the purposes of ss 57(2) and 57(3) of the Act;

(b)    not hold native title in trust;

(c)    act as agent for the Ngadju People who are the common law holders of the native title rights and interests; and

(d)    perform the function set out in the Act and the Native Title (Prescribed Bodies Corporate) Regulations 1999 (Cth).

22    Mr Rumler gave evidence that, at a meeting of the Ngadju native title claim group held on 23 June 2016 at the Norseman Town Hall, he received instructions that the Ngadju Native Title Aboriginal Corporation (ICN 8297) (NNTAC) would be nominated to perform those same functions in respect of matters relating to the native title the subject of this determination that is now proposed.

23    Mr Rumler anticipated that he would shortly receive the written consent as required by s 57(2) of the Act so that it can perform the functions specified in s 57(3).

Authorisation issues

24    An issue arises because seven of the ten persons named as the applicant have died. The question is whether the surviving three persons remain authorised to deal with all matters arising in relation to the application pursuant to the Act without the need for further authorisation. In a joint submission filed by the applicant and the State of Western Australia, the Court is asked to make an order under s 84D(4) of the Act to address this issue.

25    Section 61(1) of the Act permits the making of a native title determination application by those persons who are authorised by all the persons (the native title claim group) who, according to their traditional laws and customs hold the common or group rights and interests comprising the particular native title claimed, provided the persons are also included in the native title claim group. The carriage of a native title determination is vested in the persons who jointly comprise the applicant. Section 62A relevantly provides that, in the case of a claimant application, “the applicant may deal with all matters arising under this Act in relation to the application”. This includes consenting to a determination of native title under s 87 of the Act.

26    Unchallenged evidence was given by Mr David Lanagan as to the searches he had conducted in an attempt to find written evidence as to the terms of the authorisation of the applicant and, in particular, to ascertain whether the authority of those persons who survive was intended to continue in the event that one or more people who originally comprised the applicant were deceased. Mr Lanagan is the ManagerLand, Anthropology/Heritage and Future Acts of the Goldfields Land and Sea Council (GLSC). Mr Lanagan described how, despite examining all documents kept on the GLSC’s file in relation to this proceeding, he was only able to find a copy of the original application dated 30 June 1995, lodged by the Aboriginal Legal Service with the National Native Title Tribunal. He could find no evidence of authorisation. Mr Lanagan noted that, when the original application was filed in 1995, there was no requirement for an applicant for a determination of native title to obtain authorisation from the native title claim group before making application. He also noted that the native title application was amended following amendments made in 1998 to the Act in order to satisfy the new registration test and that those amendments resulted in it being in its current form. Those amendments introduced s 251B. Schedule R in the amended Form 1 refers to a meeting of the claim group which authorised the applicant to make the application and to deal with matters arising in relation to it. Despite his efforts, Mr Lanagan was unable to find the minutes of the claim group meeting referred to in Schedule R.

27    I accept Mr Lanagan’s evidence.

28    As noted above, the Court is asked to address this matter by making an order under s 84D(4). That provision is in the following terms:

(4)    The Federal Court may, after balancing the need for due prosecution of the application and the interests of justice:

(a)    hear and determine the application, despite the defect in authorisation; or

(b)    make such other orders as the court considers appropriate.

29    As Gilmour J observed in Barunga v State of Western Australia [2011] FCA 518 (Barunga) at [14] it is an unfortunate situation for an applicant if the terms of the authorisation cannot be located. That is because the terms of a written authorisation given to the applicant in a native title determination proceeding is “of particular significance in the conduct of the proceeding” in circumstances where the applicant alone is empowered to deal with all matters arising in relation to the application. As this proceeding highlights, considerable time may be required to resolve an application for native title determination. It is important to retain reliable files, including in respect of the terms of authorisation.

30    Although there is no direct evidence of the terms of the authorisation given to the applicant, both the applicant and the State of Western Australia jointly submit that it is appropriate for the Court to make an order under s 84D(4). They point out that such an order was made by Gilmour J in Barunga after his Honour considered that the case was similar to that before Finn J in Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Islanders of the Regional Seas Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 2) [2010] FCA 643; 204 FCR 1 (Akiba), where such an order was also made. In Akiba only two of the originally named four persons making up the applicant were still alive. Justice Finn stated at [930] and [931]:

930    I am satisfied that while Mr Mye, Mr Akiba and the others were selected as representatives of their respective cluster group, the purpose of their selection was to prosecute the claim of all of the holders of native title in the claim area. It has been prosecuted to all but finality and successfully so. Justice would be denied if this matter did not proceed to a determination.

931    I am satisfied that considerable delay, cost and confusion which would bring no credit upon the legal system, would ensue if I were to require strict compliance at this late stage with the authorisation requirement of s 61 of the Act. Indeed I am not at all sanguine that strict compliance could be secured in any event for logistical reasons.

31    In their joint submission, the applicant and the State contend that, in the event that the Court considers that there is or may be a defect in the authorisation of the applicant, an order should be made under s 84D(4), it being in the interests of justice and appropriate to do so because:

(a)    the absence of the Part B Determination Area from the Part A Determination Area arose as a result of the existence of overlapping native title claims, and not any decision of the native title claim group that related to their assertion to possess (to the exclusion of all others) native title rights and interests in those two areas;

(b)    there are no longer any overlapping claims affecting the Part B Determination Area and no other party asserts to hold native title rights and interests in that area;

(c)    there is no reasonable basis to distinguish between the Part B Determination Area and the Part A Determination Area as it concerns the Full Court's findings that the Ngadju People, who are the descendants of relevant ancestors, possess native title rights and interests;

(d)    the Part B Determination is entirely consistent with the findings of the Full Court in Graham Full Court No 1 and Graham Full Court No 2; and

(e)    it is apparent that these proceedings have a lengthy procedural history whereby all issues in dispute between the parties have been exhaustively determined, including on appeal, such that the parties are in effect, if not actually, bound to resolve the remaining Ngadju claim area in the terms agreed.

32    Having regard to the joint submission, with which I respectfully agree, and to the evidence before me, I consider that it is in the interests of justice and consistent with the overarching purpose set out in s 37M of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) that an order be made under s 84D(4).

The Determination Area

33    As noted above, on 21 December 2012, Marshall J published reasons for judgment recognising that the Ngadju People hold native title in the Ngadju Trial Area proceeding: Graham No 2. That decision was upheld on appeal, with the exception of an issue as to the description of the native title claim group: Graham Full Court No 1.

34    There is no basis upon which to distinguish that finding, as perfected by the Part A Determination, with respect to the Ngadju Part B Determination Area.

35    The external boundaries of the Ngadju Part B Determination Area are described in Schedule 1 to the Minute of Proposed Orders and Determination of Native Title filed on 4 July 2017.

Why it is appropriate for the Court to make the orders sought

36    The Court is asked to make orders under s 87 of the Act in accordance with the agreed terms of the parties.

37    In support of this application, the following documents have been filed:

(a)    a Minute of Consent Orders which have been signed by each of the parties to the proceeding (the Orders);

(b)    a Minute of Consent Determination of Native Title (the Minute); and

(c)    affidavits by Mr Rumler and Mr Lanagan as described above.

38    Section 87 of the Act relevantly provides that the Court may make a determination of native title by consent over an area covered by a native title application and without holding a hearing where:

(a)    the period specified in the notice given under s 66 of the Act has ended (s 87(1));

(b)    there is an agreement between the parties on the terms of an order of the Court in relation to the proceedings (s 87(1)(a)(i));

(c)    the terms of the agreement are in writing and are signed by or on behalf of the parties and filed with the Court (s 87(1)(b));

(d)    the Court is satisfied that an order in, or consistent with, those terms would be within its power (s 87(1)(c)); and

(e)    the Court considers that it would be appropriate to make the order sought (ss 87(1A) and (2)).

39    In addition, the Court must have regard to the following matters:

(a)    whether all parties likely to be affected by an order have had independent and competent legal representation;

(b)    whether the rights and interests that are to be declared in the determination are recognisable by the law of Australia or the state in which the land is situated; and

(c)    whether all the requirements of the Act have been complied with.

40    The focus of the Court in considering whether the orders sought are appropriate under ss 87(1A) and (2) is on the making of the agreement by the parties. In Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474 North J stated at [36] and [37] that:

The Act [Native Title Act] is designed to encourage parties to take responsibility for resolving proceedings without the need for litigation. Section 87 must be construed in this context. The power must be exercised flexibly and with regard to the purpose for which the section is designed.

In this context, when the court is examining the appropriateness of an agreement, it is not required to examine whether the agreement is grounded on a factual basis which would satisfy the Court at a hearing of the application. The primary consideration of the Court is to determine whether there is an agreement and whether it was freely entered into on an informed basis: Nangkiriny v State of Western Australia (2002) 117 FCR 6; [2002] FCA 660, Ward v State of Western Australia [2006] FCA 1848. Insofar as this latter consideration applies to a State party, it will require the Court to be satisfied that the State party has taken steps to satisfy itself that there is a credible basis for an application: Munn v Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109; [2001] FCA 1229.

41    To similar effect, Mansfield J made the following observations concerning the Court’s power under s 87 in Brown v South Australia [2010] FCA 875; 189 FCR 40 at [24]:

The power of the Court under ss 86G and 87, including subs 87(4)-(7) added by the 2009 Amending Act, is extensive. Section 87 now contemplates that, in an application under s 61 of the NT Act for determination of native title, the Court may make such orders as it considers appropriate even if it does not proceed to make a determination of native title. Such orders as the parties agree may include orders which do not relate directly to the determination of native title rights and interests. They may be confined to orders which do not directly relate to the determination of native title rights and interests. No party argued that, if the parties are agreed, they could not include a sustainable benefits term in the terms of the consent determination of native title rights and interests as a supplementary term pursuant to s 87 of the Act. Indeed, it is difficult to see that the parties to an application under s 61 could not agree upon any of the matters encompassed within the coverage of an ILUA: see ss 24BB, 24CB and 24DB. Nor is there any apparent reason why the range of matters which may be the subject of an agreement incorporated into Court orders under s 87 is confined to those matters, although they are widely expressed. The only step the Court must take to include the terms of an agreement is to be satisfied that it is appropriate to do so: s 87(1A).

42    Therefore, the Court does not need to embark on its own inquiry of the merits of the claim made in the application to be satisfied that the orders sought are supportable and in accordance with the law: Cox on behalf of the Yungngora People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 588 at [3] per French J. However, it can consider that evidence for the limited purpose of being satisfied that the State is acting in good faith and rationally, which essentially involves the State satisfying itself that there is a credible basis for the application: Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People v State of Queensland [2001] FCA 1229; 115 FCR 109 at [29]-[30] per Emmett J and Yaegl People #1 v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2015] FCA 647 at [9] per Jagot J.

The application of s 87 to the application

43    I find that the requirements of s 87 of the Act are satisfied in the present case. In particular:

(a)    the period specified in the notices given under s 66 and 66A has ended (s 87(1));

(b)    the parties have reached an agreement as to the terms of a determination of native title in relation to the Ngadju Part B Determination (s 87(1)(a)(i));

(c)    the parties have recorded their agreement in the Minute (s 87 (1)(b));

(d)    an order in terms of or consistent with the Minute would be within the Court's power because:

(i)    the application is valid and was made in accordance with s 61 of the Act;

(ii)    the application is for a determination of native title in relation to an area for which there is no approved determination of native title (s 13(1)(a));

(iii)    the Minute complies with ss 94A and 225 of the Act (s 87 (1)(c));

(e)    it is appropriate that the Court make the orders sought because:

(i)    the parties are legally represented;

(ii)    the State of Western Australia has conducted searches of land tenure, mining and petroleum registries to determine the extent of “other interests” within the proposed determination area, and those interests are included in the proposed determination: see Schedule 5 of the Minute. It is also noted that the drafting of Schedule 5 was informed by the findings in Graham Full Court No 2 as to the validity of mining tenements;

(iii)    having regard to the decision in the Ngadju Trial Area proceeding (which was affirmed on appeal) and the negotiation of the consent determination the subject of this application, the Court is satisfied that the Minute sets out a description of the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the Determination Area which complies with s 225 of the Act; and

(iv)    there are no other proceedings before the Court relating to native title determination applications that cover any part of the area the subject of the application which would otherwise require orders to be made under s 67(1) of the Act (ss 87(1) and (2)).

44    The Court will now make orders by consent in accordance with the Minute.

I certify that the preceding forty-four (44) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Griffiths.

Associate:

Dated:    17 July 2017