FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MZZAE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 511
| IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA | |
| Appellant | |
| AND: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP First Respondent REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL Second Respondent |
| DATE OF ORDER: | |
| WHERE MADE: |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
2. The appellant pay the first respondent’s costs of the appeal.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
| VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY | |
| GENERAL DIVISION | VID 6 of 2013 |
| ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
| BETWEEN: | MZZAE Appellant |
| AND: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP First Respondent REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL Second Respondent |
| JUDGE: | BROMBERG J |
| DATE: | 1 MAY 2013 |
| PLACE: | MELBOURNE |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 This is an appeal from a judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court (now called the Federal Circuit Court of Australia) published as MZZAE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FMCA 1250, in which the primary judge dismissed the appellant’s application for judicial review.
2 The primary judge reviewed a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal which affirmed the decision of a delegate of the first respondent not to grant the appellant a Protection (Class XA) visa.
3 When the appeal was called on for hearing this afternoon the appellant did not appear. I am satisfied on the material provided by Counsel for the first respondent that a notice of the hearing and other communications advising of the time and place of the hearing were provided to the appellant.
4 The first respondent has applied pursuant to r 36.75 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 for an order that in the absence of the appellant the appeal be dismissed. I am prepared to make that order on the basis that the interests of justice will thereby be served: Al Mamun v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 1394 at [12]-[13] (Gray J).
5 The Court will make orders that:
1. The appeal be dismissed.
2. The appellant pay the first respondent’s costs of the appeal.
| I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Bromberg. |
Associate: