FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 18)
[2011] FCA 1508
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA | |
AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION Plaintiff | |
AND: | First Defendant (and others according to the attached schedule) |
DATE OF ORDER: | |
WHERE MADE: |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to paragraph 10 of the Orders made on 4 June 2010, the contract of sale for the Management Lot of the Sebel Lodge Yarra Valley entered into by the Receivers (as that term is defined in the orders made on 25 February 2010) on behalf of the 29th defendant with Golden Heritage Gold Pty Ltd (the 57th defendant) on 18 February 2011 is approved.
2. Costs reserved.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY | |
GENERAL DIVISION | VID 95 of 2010 |
BETWEEN: | AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION Plaintiff
|
AND: | MARK RONALD LETTEN First Defendant (and others according to the attached schedule) |
JUDGE: | GORDON J |
DATE: | 22 december 2011 |
PLACE: | MELBOURNE |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 The facts giving rise to this application are relevantly summarised in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 16) [2011] FCA 1308. I adopt the same defined terms in these reasons for decision.
2 These reasons for decision concern paragraph 1(c) of the Amended Interlocutory Process filed by the Receivers on 13 December 2011 which concerns the sale of the Management Lot (the property located at Heritage Avenue, Chirnside Park Victoria, being Lot 34 on Plan of Subdivision 415064K and consisting of the common areas of the Sebel Heritage Yarra Valley).
3 Under paragraph 1(c) of the Amended Interlocutory Process, if the Boerkamp Contract was terminated, the Receivers sought an order pursuant to paragraph 10 of the 4 June Orders for:
1. approval of the contract of sale for the Management Lot entered into by the Receivers with the 57th defendant, GHG, on 18 February 2011 (the Contingency Contract) in the event that AFML did not exercise its right of first refusal under cl 22.6 of the HMA; and
2. in the event that AFML did exercise its right of first refusal under cl 22.6 of the HMA, approval of the sale of the Management Lot to AFML on the terms set out in a form of contract provided to AFML on 7 October 2011.
4 On 20 December 2010, the Receivers filed an affidavit. The purpose of that affidavit was to provide an update “in respect of Glenbelle’s application to AFML for approval of the sale of the Management Lot to GHG pursuant to cl 22.4(b)(ii) of the HMA”. On 22 December 2010, the Receivers filed a further affidavit which addressed the fact that the members of the Hotel Scheme had resolved not to exercise the right of first refusal as well as the current attitude of GHG to this application.
5 Before turning to the merits of the application, a number of matters should be noted. First, the Boerkamp Contract was terminated: see Letten (No 16) at [48]. Secondly, AFML has not exercised its right of first refusal under cl 22.6 of the HMA. Thirdly, GHG neither consents to nor opposes this approval application. AFML’s current attitude is not presently known. However, given AFML’s contractual rights under the HMA, I do not consider it to be prejudiced by the Court determining this application. Fourthly, the Contingency Contract is subject to a number of conditions subsequent. For present purposes, the relevant condition is that contained in cl 22.3 – Court approval of the sale prior to the Sunset Date (as that term is defined in the Contingency Contract).
6 The applicable principles were relevantly summarised in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 11) [2011] FCA 449 at [12]-[18]. The sale process undertaken by the Receivers in relation to the Management Lot was explained in Letten (No 16) at [18]ff.
7 I am satisfied that taking into account all the relevant variables and circumstances of this particular application, the Receivers have taken reasonable care to achieve, and have achieved, an acceptable sale of the Management Lot. Accordingly, pursuant to paragraph 10 of the Orders made on 4 June 2010, the Court approves the contract of sale for the Management Lot of the Sebel Lodge Yarra Valley entered into by the Receivers on behalf of Glenbelle with GHG on 18 February 2011.
I certify that the preceding seven (7) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Gordon. |
Associate:
SCHEDULE OF PARTIES
LGH HOLDINGS LIMITED (ACN 007 191 943)
Second Defendant
211 WELLINGTON ROAD PTY LTD (ACN 092 663 860)
Third Defendant
BLUEMIST HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 097 306 922)
Fourth Defendant
DELLWOOD HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 098 505 803)
Fifth Defendant
ENMORE ENTERPRISES PTY LTD (ACN 082 158 487)
Sixth Defendant
FIRBANK ARCH PTY LTD (ACN 059 464 381)
Seventh Defendant
GLENLINE PTY LTD (ACN 098 532 364)
Eighth Defendant
GERLING HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 091 726 457)
Ninth Defendant
LGH ADMINISTRATION PTY LTD (ACN 007 165 069)
Tenth Defendant
LGH FINANCE PTY LTD (ACN 078 859 248)
Eleventh Defendant
LOW HEAD VILLAGE PTY LTD (ACN 091 731 958)
Twelfth Defendant
NICHOLSON STREET PTY LTD (ACN 069 104 089)
Thirteenth Defendant
HOLLOWAY CREST PTY LTD (ACN 091 731 967)
Fourteenth Defendant
ROSEBERY ENTERPRISES PTY LTD (ACN 091 826 229)
Fifteenth Defendant
SIMMS INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 093 504 511)
Sixteenth Defendant
SY21 RETAIL PTY LTD (ACN 107 874 564)
Seventeenth Defendant
THE GLEN CENTRE HAWTHORN PTY LTD (ACN 089 906 543)
Eighteenth Defendant
CASTELLO HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 088 204 175)
Nineteenth Defendant
TWINVIEW NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 097 307 278)
Twentieth Defendant
YARRA VALLEY GOLF PTY LTD (ACN 066 632 479)
Twenty-First Defendant
ADINA RISE PTY LTD (ACN 083 181 122)
Twenty-Second Defendant
ALBRIGHT INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 088 204 166)
Twenty-Third Defendant
ASHFIELD RISE PTY LTD (ACN 093 504 806)
Twenty-Fourth Defendant
BRADFIELD CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 088 204 371)
Twenty-Fifth Defendant
COPELAND ENTERPRISES PTY LTD (ACN 093 504 824)
Twenty-Sixth Defendant
DEVLIN WAY PTY LTD (ACN 088 264 813)
Twenty-Seventh Defendant
FIRST HAZELWOOD PTY LTD (ACN 093 505 303)
Twenty-Eighth Defendant
GLENBELLE PTY LTD (ACN 097 306 646)
Twenty-Ninth Defendant
GLENVALE WAY PTY LTD (ACN 088 287 021)
Thirtieth Defendant
GREENVIEW LANE PTY LTD (ACN 093 505 312)
Thirty-First Defendant
HALLMARK CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 093 505 312)
Thirty-Second Defendant
MOORLEIGH HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 088 287 058)
Thirty-Third Defendant
NORTON RIDGE PTY LTD (ACN 078 821 066)
Thirty-Fourth Defendant
RALEIGH GLEN PTY LTD (ACN 088 204 380)
Thirty-Fifth Defendant
REDCREST HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 100 836 486)
Thirty-Sixth Defendant
SURI CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 093 505 321)
Thirty-Seventh Defendant
SUTTON RISE PTY LTD (ACN 088 204 399)
Thirty-Eighth Defendant
THE VIRTUAL MLMER PTY LTD (ACN 065 374 665)
Thirty-Ninth Defendant
TIVENDALE PTY LTD (ACN 093 505 349)
Fortieth Defendant
TULLOCH DOWNES PTY LTD (ACN 078 895 048)
Forty-First Defendant
MAINKING PTY LTD (ACN 100 790 485)
Forty-Second Defendant
TOPGLEN PTY LTD (ACN 096 857 564)
Forty-Third Defendant
ALLBLUE PTY LTD (ACN 100 836 388)
Forty-Fourth Defendant
ARANBAY PTY LTD (ACN 098 532 319)
Forty-Fifth Defendant
MELVILLE CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 091 911 045)
Forty-Sixth Defendant
TILLEY LANE PTY LTD (ACN 086 136 361)
Forty-Seventh Defendant
HPSC PTY LTD (ACN 059 930 139
Forty-Eighth Defendant
JENSDALE PTY LTD (ACN 098 367 974)
Forty-Ninth Defendant
OAKDALE RISE PTY LTD (ACN 091 598 908)
Fiftieth Defendant
MAYWOOD INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 091 599 218)
Fifty-First Defendant
ACETRAIN PTY LTD (ACN 100 820 282)
Fifty-Second Defendant
SAGE BAY PTY LTD (ACN 097 306 628)
Fifty-Third Defendant
TOBAGO HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 093 504 520)
Fifty-Fourth Defendant
WILHELMUS ANTONIUS JOANNES BOERKAMP
Fifty-Fifth Defendant
AUSTPAC FUNDS MANAGEMENT LIMITED
Fifty-Sixth Defendant
GOLDEN HERITAGE GOLF PTY LTD
Fifty-Seventh Defendant