FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Balgra Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Con Makris Family Trust v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 1173


Citation:

Balgra Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Con Makris Family Trust v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 1173



Parties:

BALGRA PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CON MAKRIS FAMILY TRUST v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION



File number:

SAD 46 of 2009



Judge:

MANSFIELD J



Date of judgment:

29 October 2010



Date of hearing:

Heard on the papers

 

 

Date of last submissions:

14 September 2010

 

 

Place:

Adelaide

 

 

Division:

GENERAL DIVISION

 

 

Category:

No catchwords

 

 

Number of paragraphs:

1

 

 

Counsel for the Applicant:

BL Jones

 

 

Solicitor for the Applicant:

Cowell Clarke

 

 

Counsel for the Respondent:

LB Price

 

 

Solicitor for the Respondent:

Jackson McDonald



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

 

GENERAL DIVISION

SAD 46 of 2009

 

BETWEEN:

BALGRA PTY LTD

AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CON MAKRIS FAMILY TRUST

Applicant

 

AND:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

Respondent

 

 

JUDGE:

MANSFIELD J

DATE OF ORDER:

29 OCTOBER 2010

WHERE MADE:

ADELAIDE

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.                  There be no order as to the costs of the proceeding.


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court’s website.




IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

 

GENERAL DIVISION

SAD 46 of 2009

 

BETWEEN:

BALGRA PTY LTD

AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CON MAKRIS FAMILY TRUST

Applicant

 

AND:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

Respondent

 

 

JUDGE:

MANSFIELD J

DATE:

29 OCTOBER 2010

PLACE:

ADELAIDE


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                     For the reasons given in an associated matter: Balgra Shopping Centre Management Pty Ltd in its Capacity as Trustee of the Balgra Shopping Centre Management Trust v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 1172, I order that there be no order as to the costs of the proceeding.

 

I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Mansfield.



Associate:


Dated:         29 October 2010