FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Johnstone v HIH Insurance Ltd (In Liquidation) [2009] FCA 1314



 


 


 


 


 


BRIAN ALEXANDER JOHNSTONE v HIH INSURANCE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 008 636 575)& ORS

NSD 317 of 2002

 

 

BRIAN ALEXANDER JOHNSTONE v HANNOVER RUCKVERSICHERUNG AG & ORS

NSD 449 of 2007

 

 

 

EMMETT J

6 NOVEMBER 2009

SYDNEY

 

 



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

 

NSD 317 of 2002

 

BETWEEN:

BRIAN ALEXANDER JOHNSTONE

Applicant

 

AND:

HIH INSURANCE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION)

(ACN 008 636 575)

First Respondent

 

GEOFFREY ARTHUR COHEN

Second Respondent

 

JUSTIN HERBERT GARDENER

Third Respondent

 

CHARLES PERCY ABBOTT

Fourth Respondent

 

ROBERT REGINALD STITT

Fifth Respondent

 

RODNEY STEPHEN ADLER

Sixth Respondent

 

RAYMOND REGINALD WILLIAMS

Seventh Respondent

 

TERENCE KEVIN CASSIDY

Eighth Respondent

 

DOMINIC FODERA

Ninth Respondent

 

ARTHUR ANDERSON

Tenth Respondent

 

HANNOVER RUSKVERSICHERUNGS-AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (ARBN 002 927 031)

Eleventh Respondent

 

HANNOVER REINSURANCE (IRELAND) LTD

Twelfth Respondent

 

 

E&S REINSURANCE (IRELAND) LTD

Thirteenth Respondent

 

SWISS RE AUSTRALIA LTD (ACN 004 360 909)

Fifteenth Respondent

 

 

JUDGE:

EMMETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

6 NOVEMBER 2009

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.         The proceeding be dismissed.



Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court’s website.




IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

NSD 449 of 2007

 

BETWEEN:

BRIAN ALEXANDER JOHNSTONE

Plaintiff

 

AND:

HANNOVER RUCKVERSICHERUNG AG

(ARBN 002 927 031)

First Defendant

 

HANNOVER REINSURANCE (IRELAND) LTD

Second Defendant

 

E & S REINSURANCE (IRELAND) LTD

Third Defendant

 

JUDGE:

EMMETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

6 NOVEMBER 2009

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.         The proceeding be dismissed.



Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court’s website.




IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

 

 

NSD 317 OF 2002

BETWEEN:

BRIAN ALEXANDER JOHNSTONE

Applicant

 

AND:

HIH INSURANCE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION)

(ACN 008 636 575)

First Respondent

 

GEOFFREY ARTHUR COHEN

Second Respondent

 

JUSTIN HERBERT GARDENER

Third Respondent

 

CHARLES PERCY ABBOTT

Fourth Respondent

 

ROBERT REGINALD STITT

Fifth Respondent

 

RODNEY STEPHEN ADLER

Sixth Respondent

 

RAYMOND REGINALD WILLIAMS

Seventh Respondent

 

TERENCE KEVIN CASSIDY

Eighth Respondent

 

DOMINIC FODERA

Ninth Respondent

 

ARTHUR ANDERSON

Tenth Respondent

 

HANNOVER RUSKVERSICHERUNGS-AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (ARBN 002 927 031)

Eleventh Respondent

 

HANNOVER REINSURANCE (IRELAND) LTD

Twelfth Respondent

 

E&S REINSURANCE (IRELAND) LTD

Thirteenth Respondent

 

SWISS RE AUSTRALIA LTD (ACN 004 360 909)

Fifteenth Respondent

 

 

NSD 449 OF 2007

BETWEEN:

BRIAN ALEXANDER JOHNSTONE

Plaintiff

 

AND:

HANNOVER RUCKVERSICHERUNG AG

(ARBN 002 927 031)

First Defendant

 

HANNOVER REINSURANCE (IRELAND) LTD

Second Defendant

 

E & S REINSURANCE (IRELAND) LTD

Third Defendant

 

JUDGE:

EMMETT J

DATE:

6 NOVEMBER 2009

PLACE:

SYDNEY


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                          These two proceedings were listed for directions today in order to determine whether they are still on foot.  The applicant in NSD 317 of 2002, being the plaintiff in NSD 449 of 2007 is Mr Brian Alexander Johnstone.  Both proceedings were in Tamberlin J’s docket.  In the first proceeding, NSD 317 of 2002, an order was made on 28 April 2006, giving the applicant leave to file a notice of discontinuance.  No such notice of discontinuance has been filed. 

2                          In proceeding NSD 449 of 2007, orders were made on 20 December 2007.  On that occasion Tamberlin J ordered that the proceeding be stayed until the costs of certain of the respondents in the earlier proceeding had been paid.  A further order for costs was made and the first respondent was given leave to collect and tax the costs forthwith. 

3                          When both matters were called on for directions today there was no appearance for Mr Johnstone.  The solicitors on the record for Mr Johnstone were notified of the directions hearings.  In the circumstances I consider it is appropriate that each of the proceedings be dismissed.

           

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett.



Associate:


Dated:         12 November 2009




Solicitor for the Seventh Respondent in NSD 317 of 2002:

Arnold Bloch Leibler

 

 

Solicitor for the Eleventh to Thirteenth Respondents in NSD 317 of 2002 and the Respondents in NSD 449 of 2007:

Minter Ellison


Date of Hearing:

6 November 2009

 

 

Date of Judgment:

6 November 2009