FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pratt (No 3) [2009] FCA 407


CORRIGENDUM

 


 


 


AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION

v RICHARD PRATT

 

VID 443 of 2008

 

 

RYAN J

29 April 2009 (CORRIGENDUM 8 MAY 2009)

MELBOURNE




IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 443 of 2008

 

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION

Prosecutor

 

AND:

RICHARD PRATT

Defendant

 

JUDGE:

RYAN J

DATE:

29 april 2009

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

 

CORRIGENDUM

Amendment to the Reasons for Ruling on Admissibility of Alleged Admissions by Defendant published on 29 April 2009:

1.         The Appearances section be amended to read as follows;

Counsel for the Prosecutor:

Mr M Dean SC with Dr S Donaghue

 

 

Solicitor for the Prosecutor:

Office of the Commonwealth Director

of Public Prosecutions

 

 

Counsel for the ACCC (granted leave to be represented separately but only in relation to claims of legal professional privilege):

Ms K Judd SC with Mr R Attiwill

 

 

 

Solicitor for the ACCC (exercising its leave for separate representation solely on the question of legal professional privilege):

Australian Government Solicitor

 

 

 

Counsel for the Defendant:

Mr R Richter QC with Mr N Clelland SC,

Dr S McNicol, Mr A Palmer

and Ms K L Walker

 

 

Solicitor for the Defendant:

Arnold Bloch Leibler


I certify that the preceding paragraph is a true copy of the Corrigendum to the Reasons for Ruling herein of the Honourable Justice Ryan.


Associate:


Dated:         8th May 2009