FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Heard v CBFC Limited (No 3) [2009] FCA 318



 


 


 


 


 


RUSSELL JOHN HEARD v CBFC LIMITED (ACN 008 519 462)

VID 655 of 2008

 

NORTH J

30 MARCH 2009

MELBOURNE




IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 655 of 2008

 

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

RUSSELL JOHN HEARD

Appellant

 


AND:

CBFC LIMITED (ACN 008 519 462)

Respondent

 

 

JUDGE:

NORTH J

DATE OF ORDER:

30 MARCH 2009

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.         The motion, notice of which was filed by the applicant on 30 December 2008, be dismissed.

2.         The applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs of the motion.


 

 

 

 

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court’s website.



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 655 of 2008

 

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

RUSSELL JOHN HEARD

Appellant

 


AND:

CBFC LIMITED (ACN 008 519 462)

Respondent

 

 

JUDGE:

NORTH J

DATE:

30 MARCH 2009

PLACE:

MELBOURNE


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                          Before the Court is a motion, notice of which was given by the appellant on 30 December 2008, seeking reinstatement of his appeal which had been dismissed on 8 December 2008 for non-appearance. 

2                          The appellant failed to originally appear on 2 March 2009 to pursue the motion for reinstatement.  On that day, the motion was adjourned until today, 30 March 2009. 

3                          The appellant has yet again failed to appear to pursue the motion for reinstatement.  On the basis of his failure to appear, the motion for reinstatement is dismissed.  In the circumstances, it is unnecessary to deal with the respondent’s motion filed on 20 February 2009 seeking that the appeal be dismissed as incompetent. 

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice North.


Associate:


Dated:         30 March 2009


Counsel for the Appellant:

The appellant did not appear

 

 

Solicitor for the Respondent:

Ms A Koumides of Gadens Lawyers


Date of Hearing:

30 March 2009

 

 

Date of Judgment:

30 March 2009