FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sheiman Ultrasonic Research Foundation Pty Ltd v Novapharm Research (Australia) Pty Limited [2008] FCA 1902
CORRIGENDUM
SHEIMAN ULTRASONIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION PTY LTD (ACN 067 053 516) and VLADIMIR SHEIMAN v NOVAPHARM RESERACH (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (ACN 003 0867 637), SABAN VENTURES PTY LIMITED (ACN 096 504 433), NANOSONICS LIMITED (ABN 11 095 076 896), MAURICE STANG, STEVEN KRITZLER, ALEX (ALEXEI) SAVA, SERGE JOUKOV, IAN ERNST and BALDWIN SHELSTON WATERS (NOW TRADING AS SHELSTON IP)
NSD 2444 of 2007
TAMBERLIN J
17 DECEMBER 2008
(CORRIGENDUM 19 DECEMBER 2008)
SYDNEY
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY |
NSD 2444 of 2007 |
|
BETWEEN: |
SHEIMAN ULTRASONIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION PTY LTD (ACN 067 053 516) First Applicant
VLADIMIR SHEIMAN Second Applicant
|
|
AND: |
NOVAPHARM RESEARCH (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED (ACN 003 0867 637) First Respondent
SABAN VENTURES PTY LIMITED (ACN 096 504 433) Second Respondent
NANOSONICS LIMITED (ABN 11 095 076 896) Third Respondent
MAURICE STANG Fourth Respondent
STEVEN KRITZLER Fifth Respondent
ALEX (ALEXEI) SAVA Sixth Respondent
SERGE JOUKOV Seventh Respondent
IAN ERNST Eighth Respondent
BALDWIN SHELSTON WATERS (NOW TRADING AS SHELSTON IP) Ninth Respondent
|
|
JUDGE: |
TAMBERLIN J |
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
17 DECEMBER 2008 |
|
WHERE MADE: |
SYDNEY |
CORRIGENDUM
At the hearing on 24 April 2008, the first eight respondents indicated they no longer continue to press an application for summary dismissal, but pressed an application for security for costs against the first applicant. The ninth respondent pressed its application for summary judgment and strike out of parts of the Further Amended Statement of Claim.
I certify that the preceding one (1) paragraph
is a true copy of the Corrigendum to the
Reasons for Judgment of the
Honourable Justice Tamberlin
Associate:
Dated: 19 December 2008
