FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Workers’ Union of Employees, Queensland v Etheridge Shire Council [2008] FCA 1268
CORRIGENDA
QUD 481 of 2006
STATE OF QUEENSLAND v ETHERIDGE SHIRE COUNCIL and WORKPLACE AUTHORITY DIRECTOR
QUD 39 of 2007
SPENDER J
20 august 2008 (CORRIGENDA 27 August 2008)
BRISBANE
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY |
QUD481 OF 2006 |
|
BETWEEN: |
THE AUSTRALIAN WORKERS' UNION OF EMPLOYEES, QUEENSLAND First Applicant
QUEENSLAND SERVICES, INDUSTRIAL UNION OF EMPLOYEES Second Applicant
|
|
AND:
|
ETHERIDGE SHIRE COUNCIL First Respondent
WORKPLACE AUTHORITY DIRECTOR Second Respondent
STATE OF QUEENSLAND Intervener
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QUD 39 OF 2007
BETWEEN: STATE OF QUEENSLAND
Applicant
AND: ETHERIDGE SHIRE COUNCIL
First Respondent
WORKPLACE AUTHORITY DIRECTOR
Second Respondent
|
SPENDER J |
|
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
27 AUGUST 2008 |
|
WHERE MADE: |
BRISBANE |
CORRIGENDA
1. In paragraph 39, line 2, for “Employer Advocate” read “Employment Advocate”.
2. In paragraph 47, line 3, for “respondents” read “applicants”.
3. In paragraph 49, line 3, for “electrical fitting” read “electrical fittings”.
4. In paragraph 56, line 1, after “his” insert “Honour’s”.
5. In paragraph 81 for “consistent” read “inconsistent”.
6. In paragraphs 88 and 89, for “Local Government (Divisional Boards) Act 1879” read “the Divisional Boards Act of 1879 (Qld) 43 Vic No 17”.
7. In paragraph 89, line 2, for “52 Vic No 4” read “51 Vic No 4”.
8. In paragraph 93, lines 2-3, for “Section 5 of the 1902 Act contained definition” read “Section 7 of the 1902 Act as originally enacted contained a definition”.
9. In paragraph 94, line 4, insert a close bracket after “LGA”.
10. In paragraph 95, line 1, for “1982” read “1882”.
11. In paragraph 95, line 7, delete the comma after “mining”.
12. In paragraph 129, line 4, for “Etheridge Shire” read “relevant local government area”.
13. In paragraph 133, line 4, delete “and” after “Etheridge Shire Council,”.
14. In paragraph 134, replace the first sentence so as to read “Each of these activities was the subject of detailed analysis by Mr D Jackson QC, Senior Counsel for the State of Queensland:”.
15. In paragraph 134, line 4 under “Childcare centre”, delete “and” after “$33,741.80,”.
16. In paragraph 134, line 6 under “Childcare centre”, for “a surplus” read “the surplus”.
17. In paragraph 134, line 4 under “Assessment of building work applications”, for “they are” read “it is”.
18. In paragraph 152, line 5, insert quotation marks around “sole invitee”.
19. In paragraph 153, line 2, for “power” read “powers”.
|
I certify that the preceding nineteen (19) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Corrigenda to the Reasons for Judgment of his HonourJustice Spender. |
Associate:
Dated: 27 August 2008
