FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v NuEra Wellness Centre Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 436



CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – refusing or failing to comply with a notice – s 155 of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)



 


 


 


 


AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v NUERA WELLNESS CENTRE PTY LTD

VID 576 of 2007

 

NORTH J

20 MARCH 2008

MELBOURNE




IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 576 of 2007

 

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION CONSUMER COMMISSION

Prosecutor

 

AND:

NUERA WELLNESS CENTRE PTY LTD

Defendant

 

 

JUDGE:

NORTH J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 MARCH 2008

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.                  The NuEra Wellness Centre Pty Ltd is convicted of failing to comply with s 155(5)(a) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth).

2.                  The NuEra Wellness Centre Pty Ltd is fined $6000 of that offence.


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 576 of 2007

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION CONSUMER COMMISSION

Prosecutor

 

AND:

NUERA WELLNESS CENTRE PTY LTD

Defendant

 

 

JUDGE:

NORTH J

DATE:

20 MARCH 2008

PLACE:

MELBOURNE


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                     NuEra Wellness Centre Pty Ltd (the company) was charged under s 155(5)(a) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (the Act) of refusing or failing to comply with a notice issued to it under s 155(1) of the Act.  The offence took place on 22 November 2006.  The company entered a plea of guilty to the offence on 22 December 2007.

2                     This offence is a reflection of the conduct of Micheal Rana, sole director of the company at the time of the offence, but under the influence of Paul Rana.

3                     The circumstances of Micheal Rana’s wrongdoing are set out in the reasons for judgment in Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Rana [2008] FCA 435.  The wrongdoing is of a serious order and on this basis the appropriate penalty is a fine of $6000.

 

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice North.



Associate:


Dated:         15 July 2008


Counsel for the Prosecution:

Ms R Orr

 

 

Solicitor for the Prosecution:

Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions

 

 

Counsel for the Defendant:

Mr T Alexander


Date of Hearing:

22 December 2007, 18 & 25 February & 20 March 2008

 

 

Date of Judgment:

20 March 2008