FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Sensis Pty Ltd v Premier Event Hire Pty Ltd, in the matter of Premier Event Hire Pty Ltd  [2006] FCA 1673



 


 


 


 


SENSIS PTY LTD (ACN 007 423 912) v PREMIER EVENT HIRE PTY LTD (ACN 105 833 190)

VID 1034 OF 2006

 

YOUNG J

28 NOVEMBER 2006

MELBOURNE



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 1034 OF 2006

 

IN THE MATTER OF PREMIER EVENT HIRE PTY LTD (ACN 105 833 190)

 

BETWEEN:

SENSIS PTY LTD (ACN 007 423 912)

Plaintiff

 

AND:

PREMIER EVENT HIRE PTY LTD (ACN 105 833 190)

Defendant

 

 

JUDGE:

YOUNG J

DATE OF ORDER:

28 NOVEMBER 2006

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.             The winding up of Premier Event Hire Pty Ltd (ACN 105 833 190) is terminated on 28 November 2006.

2.             This order be entered by the order being authenticated in Court in accordance with O 36 rr 5 and 7 of the Federal Court Rules.

 

 

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 1034 OF 2006

 

IN THE MATTER OF PREMIER EVENT HIRE PTY LTD (ACN 105 833 190)

 

BETWEEN:

SENSIS PTY LTD (ACN 007 423 912)

Plaintiff

 

AND:

PREMIER EVENT HIRE PTY LTD (ACN 105 833 190)

Defendant

 

 

JUDGE:

YOUNG J

DATE:

28 NOVEMBER 2006

PLACE:

MELBOURNE


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                     In this matter, Mr Nicolo Gulino, a director and shareholder of Premier Event Hire Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (‘the company’) makes an application under s 482(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for an order terminating the winding up of the company.  An order for the winding up of the company was made by this Court on 16 November 2006 in consequence of the company’s non-compliance with a statutory demand served by the plaintiff, Sensis Pty Ltd. 

2                     Mr Gulino has filed an affidavit dated 22 November 2006 in which he explains that he did not address the question of compliance with a notice with sufficient attention or treat it sufficiently seriously.  Subsequently, Mr Gulino has arranged for the company to pay to the plaintiff the entirety of the debt owed to it together with costs requested by the plaintiff.  Mr Gulino has also arranged for the liquidator to be paid the entirety of his fees.  The plaintiff does not oppose this application for the termination of the winding up, having been paid all moneys due to it. 

3                     The liquidator also does not oppose the termination of the winding up.  By letter dated 22 November 2006, the liquidator has confirmed that the company is solvent and that the petitioning creditor has been paid in full.  He also confirms that his fees and costs have been paid and that he has no objection of the company being taken out of liquidation.  In his affidavit, Mr Gulino deposes that the company does not owe any money to a creditor and that is it able to pay its debts as and when they fall due.  In the circumstances, I am prepared to make the order sought.

4                     I have also been asked to make an order that my order terminating the winding up be authenticated in Court in accordance with O 36 rr 5 and 7 of the Federal Court Rules.  To save costs and to permit the company to resume trading in its event hire business as soon as practicable, I am prepared to authenticate the order in Court. 

5                     Accordingly the orders of the Court are as follows:

(1)               The winding up of Premier Event Hire Pty Ltd is terminated on 28 November 2006.

(2)               This order be entered by the order being authenticated in Court in accordance with O 36 rr 5 and 7 of the Federal Court Rules.

 

I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Young.


Associate:


Dated:         4 December 2006



Counsel for the N Guilino:

N Frenkel

 

 

Solicitor for the N Guilino:

Tartaglia & Associates

 

 

Solicitor for the Plaintiff:

B Broadhead of Voitin Walker Davis

 

 

Solicitor for the Defendant:

The Defendant did not appear

 

 

Date of Hearing:

28 November 2006

 

 

Date of Judgment:

28 November 2006