FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NSI Dental Pty Ltd v University of Melbourne [2006] FCA 1216


CORRIGENDUM

 


 


 


 


NSI DENTAL PTY LIMITED (ACN 108 218 104) v UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE AND RECALDENT PTY LTD (ACN 105 290 006)

NSD 1033 OF 2004

 

 

 

TAMBERLIN J

8 SEPTEMBER 2006

CORRIGENDUM 30 NOVEMBER 2006

SYDNEY



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 1033 OF 2004

 

BETWEEN:

NSI DENTAL PTY LIMITED (ACN 108 218 104)

Applicant

 

AND:

UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE

First Respondent

 

RECALDENT PTY LTD (ACN 105 290 006)

Second Respondent

 

 

JUDGE:

TAMBERLIN J

DATE OF ORDER:

8 SEPTEMBER 2006

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

CORRIGENDUM

 

Amendment to the Reasons for Judgment of Tamberlin J delivered on 8 September 2006.

Paragraph 87 should read:

If Claim 7 is valid, NSI agrees that the parties who have infringed are those who have exploited the three products within the jurisdiction.  In relation to Topacal C-5, this includes NSI and the second and third cross-respondents.  In relation to Dentacal, if infringement is found and the patent is valid, then NSI and Topacal are the infringing parties.  In relation to Phoscal, the relevant parties are NSI, Topacal and the third-cross respondent.  At this point, I do not propose to find and determine who are the relevant parties for the grant of relief, and I will reserve my determination of this question until the parties have an opportunity to consider my reasons and make any further submissions on this question.


I certify that this is a true copy of the

Corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment

of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin.

 

Associate:                                                       Dated:             30 November 2006