FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Furlong v Maxim Electrical Services (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 740


CORRIGENDUM


MURRAY FURLONG v MAXIM ELECTRICAL SERVICES (AUST) PTY LTD (ACN 088 295 907), WALTER J PRATT LTD (ACN 004 714 989), COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, ENERGY, INFORMATION, POSTAL, PLUMBING AND ALLIED SERVICES UNION OF AUSTRALIA, DAVID MIER, MARK GRECH,

MICHAEL DOUGLAS and MAXIM ELECTRICAL SERVICES (VIC) PTY LTD (ACN 088 037 290)

 

VID 1580 OF 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MARSHALL J

14 JUNE 2006 (CORRIGENDUM DATED 16 JUNE 2006)

MELBOURNE


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 1580 OF 2004

 

BETWEEN:

MURRAY FURLONG

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MAXIM ELECTRICAL SERVICES (AUST) PTY LTD

(ACN 088 295 907)

FIRST RESPONDENT

 

WALTER J PRATT LTD (ACN 004 714 989)

SECOND RESPONDENT

 

COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, ENERGY, INFORMATION, POSTAL, PLUMBING AND ALLIED SERVICES UNION OF AUSTRALIA

THIRD RESPONDENT

 

DAVID MIER

FOURTH RESPONDENT

 

MARK GRECH

FIFTH RESPONDENT

 

MICHAEL DOUGLAS

SIXTH RESPONDENT

 

MAXIM ELECTRICAL SERVICES (VIC) PTY LTD

(ACN 088 037 290)

SEVENTH RESPONDENT

 

 

JUDGE:

MARSHALL J

DATE OF ORDER:

14 JUNE 2006 (CORRIGENDUM DATED 16 JUNE 2006)

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

 

CORRIGENDUM


In the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Marshall on 14 June 2006:


1.                  In paragraph [12], the phrase:


“the Union or any respondent other that Maxim (Vic)”


should read:


“the Union or any respondent other than Maxim (Vic)”


I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Marshall.


Associate:



Dated:              16 June 2006