FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Croker v Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCA 372
CORRIGENDUM
CROKER v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
NSD 1230 of 2005
COWDROY J
6 APRIL 2006 (CORRIGENDUM 20 APRIL 2006)
SYDNEY
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALESDISTRICT REGISTRY |
1230 OF 2005 |
|
BETWEEN: |
CLAYTON ROBERT CROKER APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGE: |
COWDROY J |
|
DATE: |
20 APRIL 2006 |
|
PLACE: |
SYDNEY |
CORRIGENDUM
1 In paragraph 26 of the judgment, delete the words ‘constitutional or’ and the words ‘the Constitution and’. At the beginning of paragraph 26, insert the following sentence:
Mr Croker’s pleadings do not contain a true claim arising under the Constitution and accordingly the Court does not have jurisdiction under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903.’
|
I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Cowdroy. |
Associate:
Dated: 20 April 2006
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Croker v Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCA 372
CORRIGENDUM
CROKER v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
NSD 1230 of 2005
COWDROY J
6 APRIL 2006 (CORRIGENDUM 3 MAY 2006)
SYDNEY
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALESDISTRICT REGISTRY |
NSD 1230 OF 2005 |
|
BETWEEN: |
CLAYTON ROBERT CROKER APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGE: |
COWDROY J |
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
3 MAY 2006 |
|
WHERE MADE: |
SYDNEY |
CORRIGENDUM
2 The orders contained on the orders page should be omitted. In their place, the following orders should be inserted:
‘1. The Respondent’s motion be upheld.
2. The Application be dismissed.
3. The Applicant to pay the Respondent’s costs of the proceedings and of this motion.’
|
I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Cowdroy. |
Associate:
Dated: 3 May 2006
