FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant S259 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2005] FCA 1431
APPLICANT S259 OF 2003 v REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL and MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
NSD 1063 of 2003
WILCOX J
10 OCTOBER 2005
SYDNEY
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY |
NSD 1063 of 2003 |
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
|
BETWEEN: |
APPLICANT S259 OF 2003 APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS SECOND RESPONDENT
|
|
WILCOX J |
|
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
10 OCTOBER 2005 |
|
WHERE MADE: |
SYDNEY |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Subrule (1) of Order 51A rule 5 not apply to this application.
2. The application for an order nisi be refused.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY |
NSD 1063 of 2003 |
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
|
BETWEEN: |
APPLICANT S259 OF 2003 APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS SECOND RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGE: |
WILCOX J |
|
DATE: |
10 OCTOBER 2005 |
|
PLACE: |
SYDNEY |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
WILCOX J:
1 I have considered the papers filed in this case including the applicant’s submission. The submission does not identify a ground of review. Having considered the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal I do not think that any ground is available to the applicant. Accordingly it would be inappropriate to grant an order nisi.
2 I propose to order that subrule (1) of Order 51A rule 5 not apply to this case and that the application for an order nisi be refused.
|
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Wilcox. |
Associate:
Dated: 10 October 2005
