FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

SZBYM v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1146


SZBYM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

 

NSD935 of 2005



EDMONDS J

17 AUGUST 2005

SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD935 of 2005

 

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

SZBYM

APPELLANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

EDMONDS J

DATE OF ORDER:

17 AUGUST 2005

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.         The appeal be dismissed.

2.         The appellant pay the respondent’s costs fixed in the sum of $1,500.


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD935 of 2005

 

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

SZBYM

APPELLANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

 

JUDGE:

EDMONDS J

DATE:

17 AUGUST 2005

PLACE:

SYDNEY


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT GIVEN EX TEMPORE

(REVISED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT)

1                     After considering the reasons for judgment of the Federal Magistrate below, I have formed the view that they disclose no error on his part in deciding that the Tribunal committed no jurisdictional error. 

2                     It is clear from a reading of the Tribunal’s the reasons for decision that the Tribunal did not fail in any of the ways asserted in the first three grounds of the appellant’s notice of appeal [2 – 4]; it is equally clear from a reading of the Federal Magistrate’s reasons for judgment below that he did not fail in the way asserted in the final ground of appeal [5].

3                     The appellant made no written or oral submissions in support of his appeal and in the circumstances the appeal must be dismissed with costs.


4                     The respondent asks that I make a fixed costs order and has explained the basis on which the sum of $1,500 was arrived at.  A fixed costs order is appropriate and I order that the appellant pay the respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $1,500.

 


I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Edmonds.



Associate:


Dated:              18 August 2005


The Appellant appeared in person



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Clayton Utz



Date of Hearing:

17 August 2005



Date of Judgment:

17 August 2005