FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
von Arnim v Federal Republic of Germany (No 3) [2005] FCA 1128
DR ULRICH CHRISTOPH EBERHARD FREIHERR VON ARNIM v FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY (Represented by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions), THE COMMONWEALTH MINISTER FOR JUSTICE AND CUSTOMS, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and GROUP 4 CORRECTION SERVICES PTY LTD
V 316 of 2001
FINKELSTEIN J
16 AUGUST 2005
MELBOURNE
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY |
V 316 of 2001 |
|
BETWEEN: |
DR ULRICH CHRISTOPH EBERHARD FREIHERR VON ARNIM Applicant
|
|
AND: |
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY (Represented by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions), THE COMMONWEALTH MINISTER FOR JUSTICE AND CUSTOMS, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and GROUP 4 CORRECTION SERVICES PTY LTD Respondents
|
|
FINKELSTEIN J |
|
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
|
|
WHERE MADE: |
MELBOURNE |
1. The application be dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the second and third respondents’ costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY |
V 316 of 2001 |
|
BETWEEN: |
DR ULRICH CHRISTOPH EBERHARD FREIHERR VON ARNIM Applicant
|
|
AND: |
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY (Represented by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions), THE COMMONWEALTH MINISTER FOR JUSTICE AND CUSTOMS, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and GROUP 4 CORRECTION SERVICES PTY LTD Respondents
|
|
JUDGE: |
FINKELSTEIN J |
|
DATE: |
16 AUGUST 2005 |
|
PLACE: |
MELBOURNE |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 I delivered reasons for judgment in this application on 3 June 2005. In view of the complexity of the case I made no final orders disposing of the application, but requested the applicant to inform me if there was a particular claim not specifically dealt with but which would not be decided against him in light of the findings I had made. In response, the applicant identified aspects of his submissions which had not been specifically discussed in my reasons, as well as cases upon which he had relied but to which I had made no reference. None of the submissions and none of the cases are of any continuing relevance having regard to the findings I have in fact made. There being no other issues that I need to decide, the appropriate order to make is to dismiss the application with costs.
|
I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Finkelstein. |
Associate:
Dated: 16 August 2005
|
Counsel for the Applicant: |
Mr B Monotti |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Applicant: |
Ms K Moorhouse-Perks |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the 2nd & 3rd Respondents: |
Mr B Walters SC Mr L Maher |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the 2nd & 3rd Respondents: |
Australian Government Solicitor |
|
|
|
|
Date of Applicant’s Further Submission: |
8 June 2005 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Judgment: |
16 August 2005 |
