FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

SZCBX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 307


 

 

SZCBX v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

NSD 195 OF 2005

 

GYLES J

9 MARCH 2005

SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 195 OF 2005

 

BETWEEN:

SZCBX

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

GYLES J

DATE OF ORDER:

9 MARCH 2005

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.         The application be dismissed.

2.         The applicant is to pay the costs of the respondent.

 

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.




IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 195 OF 2005

 

BETWEEN:

SZCBX

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

 

JUDGE:

GYLES J

DATE:

9 MARCH 2005

PLACE:

SYDNEY


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                     This matter purports to be commenced by way of notice of appeal to this Court from a judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court.  The form is inappropriate for that purpose but that does not particularly matter.  What does matter is that the appeal is from an interlocutory order dismissing the proceeding for failure to comply with a procedural order.  That being the case, the appropriate application is for leave to appeal, not simply to appeal.  More importantly again, however, is the fact that the applicant does not appear this morning.

2                     When the matter was originally called there was no appearance so I stood the matter down in the list.  Half an hour more has elapsed, the matter has been called again and the applicant does not appear.  Under the circumstances I have no alternative but to dismiss the proceeding and I order that the applicant pay the respondent's costs.  That is the order of the Court.


I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Gyles.


Associate:


Dated:              29 March 2005



Counsel for the Applicant:

The Applicant did not appear



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Clayton Utz



Date of Hearing:

9 March 2005



Date of Judgment:

9 March 2005