FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Seven Network Limited v News Limited (No 4) [2005] FCA 244

CORRIGENDUM

SEVEN NETWORK LIMITED & ANOR v NEWS LIMITED & ORS

NSD 1223 of 2002

SACKVILLE J

SYDNEY

16 MARCH 2005 (CORRIGENDUM DATED 16 MARCH 2005)

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY	NSD 1223 of 2002

BETWEEN:	SEVEN NETWORK LIMITED (ACN 052 816 789) FIRST APPLICANT C7 PTY LIMITED (ACN 082 901 442) SECOND APPLICANT
AND:	NEWS LIMITED (ACN 007 871 178) FIRST RESPONDENT SKY CABLE PTY LIMITED (ACN 069 799 640) SECOND RESPONDENT TELSTRA MEDIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 069 279 027) THIRD RESPONDENT FOXTEL MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED (ACN 068 671 938) FOURTH RESPONDENT TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED (ACN 051 775 556) FIFTH RESPONDENT TELSTRA MULTIMEDIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 069 279 072) SIXTH RESPONDENT PUBLISHING AND BROADCASTING LIMITED (ACN 009 071 167) SEVENTH RESPONDENT NINE NETWORK AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 008 685 407) EIGHTH RESPONDENT SPORTS INVESTMENTS AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 065 445 418) NINTH RESPONDENT NETWORK TEN PTY LIMITED (ACN 052 515 250) TENTH RESPONDENT AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE (ACN 004 155 211) ELEVENTH RESPONDENT AUSTRALIAN RUGBY FOOTBALL LEAGUE LIMITED (ACN 003 107 293) TWELFTH RESPONDENT NATIONAL RUGBY LEAGUE INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED (ACN 081 778 538) THIRTEENTH RESPONDENT NATIONAL RUGBY LEAGUE LIMITED (ACN 082 088 962) FOURTEENTH RESPONDENT FOXTEL CABLE TELEVISION PTY LIMITED (ACN 069 008 797) FIFTEENTH RESPONDENT OPTUS VISION PTY LIMITED (ACN 066 518 821) SIXTEENTH RESPONDENT AUSTAR UNITED COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED (ACN 087 695 707) SEVENTEENTH RESPONDENT AUSTAR ENTERTAINMENT PTY LIMITED (ACN 068 104 530) EIGHTEENTH RESPONDENT IAN HUNTLY PHILIP NINETEENTH RESPONDENT NEWS PAY TV PTY LIMITED (ACN 085 095 487) TWENTIETH RESPONDENT PBL PAY TV PTY LIMITED (ACN 084 940 367) TWENTY-FIRST RESPONDENT SINGTEL OPTUS PTY LIMITED (ACN 052 833 208) TWENTY-SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE:	SACKVILLE J
DATE OF ORDER:	16 MARCH 2005 (CORRIGENDUM DATED 16 MARCH 2005)
WHERE MADE:	SYDNEY

CORRIGENDUM

1 In par 24 of the Reasons for Judgment, the second sentence should read:

‘They will contend that it is not sufficient to set aside the current licensing arrangements for the AFL pay rights or to restrain a repetition of the conduct in contravening ss 45 and 47 of the TP Act.’

2 In par 50 of the Reasons for Judgment, the word ‘with’ in the last sentence is replaced with ‘wish’.

3 In the table of appearances, ‘Malleson Stephen Jacques’ is replaced with ‘Mallesons Stephen Jaques’.

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Sackville.

Associate:

Dated: 16 March 2005

Top