FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Suchowacki v Commissioner of Taxation [2005] FCA 225

 


MICHAEL SUCHOWACKI AND MARGARET ANN SUCHOWACKI v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

 

QUD 260 OF 2004

 

LAURENCE MICHAEL DOWLING AND DEBORAH SUE DOWLING v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

 

QUD 261 OF 2004

 

MARION KAY BRADLEY, ERNEST CYRIL BRADLEY, MELISSA KAY BRADLEY AND SHEREE ANGELA VERNABLES (nee BRADLEY) v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

 

QUD 262 OF 2004

 

RONA HANNAN, ILANA HANNAN AND MAURICE HANNAN v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

 

QUD 263 OF 2004

 

 

 

 

DOWSETT J

11 FEBRUARY 2005

BRISBANE


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

QUD 260 OF 2005

 

BETWEEN:

MICHAEL SUCHOWACKI

FIRST APPLICANT

 

MARGARET ANN SUCHOWACKI

SECOND APPLICANT

 

AND:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

DOWSETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

11 FEBRUARY 2005

WHERE MADE:

BRISBANE

 

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 


1.         The time for lodgement of an appeal by the applicants against the decision of the Tribunal be extended.

2.         The matter be adjourned to 8 April 2005 for mention. 

3.         The applicants pay the respondent’s costs of the application for an extension of time fixed at $150. 

4.         Costs be reserved. 

5.         There be liberty to apply.


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

QUD 261 OF 2005

 

BETWEEN:

LAURENCE MICHAEL DOWLING

FIRST APPLICANT

 

DEBORAH SUE DOWLING

SECOND APPLICANT

 

AND:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

RESPONDENT

 


JUDGE:

DOWSETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

11 FEBRUARY 2005

WHERE MADE:

BRISBANE

 

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:



1.         The time for lodgement of an appeal by the applicants against the decision of the Tribunal be extended.

2.         The matter be adjourned to 8 April 2005 for mention. 

3.         The applicants pay the respondent’s costs of the application for an extension of time fixed at $150. 

4.         Costs be reserved. 

5.         There be liberty to apply.


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

QUD 262 OF 2005

 

BETWEEN:

MARION KAY BRADLEY

FIRST APPLICANT

 

ERNEST CYRIL BRADLEY

SECOND APPLICANT

 

MELISSA KAY BRADLEY

THIRD APPLICANT

 

SHEREE ANGELA VERNABLES (nee BRADLEY)

FOURTH APPLICANT

 

AND:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

RESPONDENT

 


JUDGE:

DOWSETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

11 FEBRUARY 2005

WHERE MADE:

BRISBANE

 

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


1.         The time for lodgement of an appeal by the applicants against the decision of the Tribunal be extended.

2.         The matter be adjourned to 8 April 2005 for mention. 

3.         The applicants pay the respondent’s costs of the application for an extension of time fixed at $150. 

4.         Costs be reserved. 

5.         There be liberty to apply.


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

QUD 263 OF 2005

 

BETWEEN:

RONA HANNAN

FIRST APPLICANT

 

ILANA HANNAN

SECOND APPLICANT

 

MAURICE HANNAN

THIRD APPLICANT

 

AND:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

RESPONDENT

 


JUDGE:

DOWSETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

11 FEBRUARY 2005

WHERE MADE:

BRISBANE

 

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:



1.         The time for lodgement of an appeal by the applicants against the decision of the Tribunal be extended.

2.         The matter be adjourned to 8 April 2005 for mention. 

3.         The applicants pay the respondent’s costs of the application for an extension of time fixed at $150. 

4.         Costs be reserved. 

5.         There be liberty to apply.



Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

Q 260 OF 2005

 

BETWEEN:

MICHAEL SUCHOWACKI

FIRST APPLICANT

 

MARGARET ANN SUCHOWACKI

SECOND APPLICANT

 

AND:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

RESPONDENT

 

 

 

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

 

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

Q 261 OF 2005

 

BETWEEN:

LAURENCE MICHAEL DOWLING

FIRST APPLICANT

 

DEBORAH SUE DOWLING

SECOND APPLICANT

 

AND:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

RESPONDENT

 

 

 

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

 

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

Q 262 OF 2005

 

BETWEEN:

MARION KAY BRADLEY

FIRST APPLICANT

 

ERNEST CYRIL BRADLEY

SECOND APPLICANT

 

MELISSA KAY BRADLEY

THIRD APPLICANT

 

SHEREE ANGELA VERNABLES (nee BRADLEY)

FOURTH APPLICANT

 

AND:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

RESPONDENT

 

 

 

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

 

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

Q 263 OF 2005

 

BETWEEN:

RONA HANNAN

FIRST APPLICANT

 

ILANA HANNAN

SECOND APPLICANT

 

MAURICE HANNAN

THIRD APPLICANT

 

AND:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

RESPONDENT

 

 

 

JUDGE:

DOWSETT J

DATE:

11 FEBRUARY 2005

PLACE:

BRISBANE


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                     Where there has been a failure to commence proceedings within the prescribed time, it is not unreasonable that the other party have the costs incurred in considering whether or not to consent to an application to extend time.  The amount should not be substantial.  The figure of $150 seems reasonable.  I have heard Mr Bickford’s submission that the Commissioner’s appeal was filed very late and that the beneficiaries ought to have been joined.  I do not think that the second part of that submission is correct.  The beneficiaries were not necessary parties to the Commissioner’s appeals.

2                     In those circumstances, in matters Q 260/04, Q 261/04, Q 262/04 and Q 263/04, I grant an extension of time within which to file an appeal against the decision of the Tribunal.  I adjourn the matters to 8 April 2005 for mention.  I order that in each case the applicant or applicants pay the respondent’s costs of the application for an extension of time fixed at $150 in each case.  Otherwise the costs are reserved.  Liberty to apply.

 

I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Dowsett.



Associate:


Dated:              22 March 2005


Counsel for the Applicants:

Mr P G Bickford



Solicitor for the Applicants:

Walsh Halligan Douglas



Counsel for the Respondents:

Mr P E Hack SC



Solicitor for the Respondents:

Australian Government Solicitor



Date of Hearing:

11 February 2005



Date of Judgment:

11 February 2005