FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Beecham Group PLC v Colgate-Palmolive Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 1482



 

 

CORRIGENDUM


 

 

 

BEECHAM GROUP PLC AND GLAXOSMITHKLINE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ABN 47 100 162 481) v COLGATE-PALMOLIVE PTY LIMITED (ABN 79 002 792 163)

 

NSD 1425 OF 2004

 

BENNETT J

29 OCTOBER 2004

SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD1425 OF 2004

 

BETWEEN:

BEECHAM GROUP PLC

FIRST APPLICANT

 

GLAXOSMITHKLINE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD

(ABN 47 100 162 481)

SECOND APPLICANT

 

AND:

COLGATE-PALMOLIVE PTY LIMITED

(ABN 79 002 792 163)

RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

BENNETT J

DATE:

29 OCTOBER 2004 (CORRIGENDUM 25 NOVEMBER 2004)

PLACE:

SYDNEY


CORRIGENDUM

  1. On the second line of paragraph [20] delete the reference to Colgate and replace with the applicants so the sentence reads:

Justice Tamberlin’s conclusion at [38] was that the balance of convenience ‘comes down strongly’ in favour of the applicants…”

  1. At the end of the final page, the reference to Counsel for the First and Second Applicants should read “AJL Bannon SC with C Moore”.

I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Bennett.


Associate:


Dated:              25 November 2004