FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
A34 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 868
A34 OF 2003 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS & ORS
N2608 OF 2003
A48 OF 2003 V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS & ORS
N2615 OF 2003
A54 OF 2003 V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS & ORS
N2620 OF 2003
EMMETT J
30 APRIL 2004
SYDNEY
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY |
N2608 of 2003 |
|
BETWEEN: |
A34 OF 2003 APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS FIRST RESPONDENT
SUE ZELINKA, MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL SECOND RESPONDENT
PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL THIRD RESPONDENT
|
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
|
|
WHERE MADE: |
SYDNEY |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Order 51A r 5(1) of the Federal Court Rules does not apply.
2. The application for an order nisi be refused.
3. The applicants pay the Minister’s costs of the proceeding.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY |
N2615 OF 2003 |
|
BETWEEN: |
A48 OF 2003 APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS FIRST RESPONDENT
PHILIPPA MCINTOSH, MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL SECOND RESPONDENT
PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL THIRD RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGE: |
EMMETT J |
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
30 APRIL 2004 |
|
WHERE MADE: |
SYDNEY |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Order 51A r 5(1) of the Federal Court Rules does not apply.
2. The application for an order nisi be refused.
3. The applicants pay the Minister’s costs of the proceeding.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY |
N2620 OF 2003 |
|
BETWEEN: |
A54 OF 2003 APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS FIRST RESPONDENT
MICHAEL NORTHCOTT, MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL SECOND RESPONDENT
PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL THIRD RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGE: |
EMMETT J |
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
30 APRIL 2004 |
|
WHERE MADE: |
SYDNEY |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Order 51A r 5(1) of the Federal Court Rules does not apply.
2. The application for an order nisi be refused.
3. The applicants pay the Minister’s costs of the proceeding.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY |
|
N2608 OF 2003
|
BETWEEN: |
A34 OF 2003 APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS FIRST RESPONDENT SUE ZELINKA, MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL SECOND RESPONDENT PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL THIRD RESPONDENT |
N2615 OF 2003
|
BETWEEN: |
A48 OF 2003 APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS FIRST RESPONDENT PHILIPPA MCINTOSH, MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL SECOND RESPONDENT PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL THIRD RESPONDENT |
N2620 OF 2003
|
BETWEEN: |
A54 OF 2003 APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS FIRST RESPONDENT MICHAEL NORTHCOTT, MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL SECOND RESPONDENT PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL THIRD RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGE: |
|
|
DATE: |
|
|
PLACE: |
SYDNEY |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 In each of proceedings numbered N2608 of 2003, N2615 of 2003 and N2620 of 2003 an application was made to the High Court by filing an affidavit in January or February 2003. The affidavits are in similar form. They claim relief in respect of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal affirming a decision of the Minister to refuse the grant of protection visas to the applicants. Each affidavit annexes a draft order nisi. The matters were remitted to this Court by the High Court. Each order nisi specifies the same grounds, being breach of rules of natural justice, error of law, failure to observe procedures that were required by the law to be observed, improper exercise of power and absence of evidence or other material to justify the making of the decision.
2 The affidavits filed in the High Court disclosed no evidence that would justify the making of such orders as are sought in the order nisi by way of prerogative writ relief. When the matters were called on today, counsel for the applicants indicated that the solicitor had no instructions. Since no reasonable cause of action was disclosed, it is appropriate to refuse an order nisi.
|
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett. |
Associate:
Dated: 5 July 2004
|
Solicitor for the Applicant: |
Mark Clisby |
|
Solicitor for the Respondent: |
Sparke Helmore |
|
Date of Hearing: |
30 April 2004 |
|
Date of Judgment: |
30 April 2004 |
