FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NBBR v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs

[2004] FCA 777


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NBBR v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

N176 of 2004

 

JACOBSON J

9 JUNE 2004

SYDNEY



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

 N176 of 2004

 

BETWEEN:

NBBR

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTRAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

JACOBSON

DATE OF ORDER:

9 JUNE 2004

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

  1. The application be dismissed.
  2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N176 of 2004

 

BETWEEN:

NBBR

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTRAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

 

JUDGE:

JACOBSON

DATE:

9 JUNE 2004

PLACE:

SYDNEY


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                     This is an application for review under section 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal handed down on 21 January 2004.  The RRT affirmed a decision of a delegate of the Minister made on 20 June 2003 refusing to grant the applicant a protection visa. 

2                     When the matter was called on for hearing this morning, the applicant did not appear.  I am satisfied that the applicant was aware that the matter was listed for hearing this morning.  First, the applicant was present in person at a directions hearing on 29 March 2004, when the matter was listed for hearing before me today.  Second, the respondent's solicitors have tendered a copy of a letter dated 3 June 2004, sent to the applicant at the address for service given in the application for review.  The letter reminded the applicant that the matter was listed for hearing today at 10.15 am.

3                     I stood the matter down until 10.35 am, in case the applicant was unavoidably delayed, but when the hearing resumed there was no appearance.

4                     The respondent asks me to dismiss the action pursuant to O 32 r 2(1)(c) of the Federal Court Rules.  I am satisfied that in the circumstances it is appropriate to make the order which is sought.  Accordingly, the orders I make are that the application be dismissed and that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding.


I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Jacobson.



Associate:


Dated:              9 June 2004



No appearance for the applicant



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Sparke Helmore (R Leahy)



Date of Hearing:

9 June 2004



Date of Judgment:

9 June 2004