FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

S382 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 670


S382 OF 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs & ORS

 

N 2535 OF 2003

 

 

 

 

 

EMMETT J

9 FEBRUARY 2004

SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 2535 OF 2003

 

ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

S382 OF 2003

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

FIRST RESPONDENT

 

PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

SECOND RESPONDENT

 

KIM ROSSER, MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

THIRD RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

EMMETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

9 FEBRUARY 2004

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.         Order 51A r 5(1) of the Federal Court Rules not apply.


2.         The application for an order nisi be refused.


3.         The applicant pay the Minister’s costs.


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 2535 OF 2003

 

ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

 

BETWEEN:

S382 OF 2003

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

FIRST RESPONDENT

 

PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

SECOND RESPONDENT

 

KIM ROSSER, MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

THIRD RESPONDENT

 

 

JUDGE:

EMMETT J

DATE:

9 FEBRUARY 2004

PLACE:

SYDNEY



REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                     On 30 June 2003 the applicant filed in the High Court a draft order nisi and an affidavit sworn on 25 June 2003.  The proceeding was commenced for constitutional writ relief in respect of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (‘the Tribunal’) made on 1 June 2000affirming a decision not to grant a protection visa to the applicant and members of his family.   The matter was remitted to this Court by Heydon J on 12 November 2003.  The affidavit in support of the draft order nisi disclosed no basis upon which any relief could be granted. 

2                     When the matter was called on for directions today there was no appearance for the applicant.  In the circumstances I propose to refuse an order nisi and to order the applicant to pay the Minister’s costs.



I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett.



Associate:


Dated:              31 May 2004



Counsel for the Applicant:

The applicant did not appear



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor



Date of Hearing:

9 February 2004



Date of Judgment:

9 February 2004