FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Kennedy v Baker [2004] FCA 562


CORRIGENDUM


TREVOR JOHN KENNEDY v PETER BAKER and AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION

 

N 2366 of 2003

 

 

 

BRANSON J

6 MAY 2004 (CORRIGENDUM 17 JUNE 2004)

SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 2366 of 2003

 

BETWEEN:

TREVOR JOHN KENNEDY

APPLICANT

 

AND:

PETER BAKER

FIRST RESPONDENT

 

AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION

SECOND RESPONDENT

 

 

JUDGE:

BRANSON J

DATE:

6 MAY 2004

PLACE:

SYDNEY


CORRIGENDUM


1.                  In par 86 the reference to ‘William v Keetly’ should read ‘William v Keelty’


2.                  In par 96 the first sentence should read:

‘It is settled law that, generally speaking, those executing a warrant in respect of premises must ensure that the occupier of the premises has, having regard to the circumstances surrounding the search, an adequate opportunity to make a claim of privilege (Commissioner of Taxation v Citibank per Bowen CJ and Fisher J at 417).’


3.                  In par 104 the following words should be added at the end of the paragraph after the word ‘anything’:

‘contained in the imaged hard drive.’


I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Branson.



Associate:


Dated:              17 June 2004