FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

S382 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 504


S382 OF 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs & ORS

 

N 2535 OF 2003

 

 

 

 

EMMETT J

9 FEBRUARY 2004

SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 2535 OF 2003

 

ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

S382 OF 2003

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

FIRST RESPONDENT

 

PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

SECOND RESPONDENT

 

KIM ROSSER, MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

THIRD RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

EMMETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

9 FEBRUARY 2004

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.         the application for an order nisi be refused;


2.         the applicant pay the Minister’s costs.


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 2535 OF 2003

 

ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

S382 OF 2003

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

FIRST RESPONDENT

 

PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

SECOND RESPONDENT

 

KIM ROSSER, MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

THIRD RESPONDENT

 

 

JUDGE:

 

EMMETT J

DATE:

9 FEBRUARY 2004

PLACE:

SYDNEY



REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                     On 30 June 2003, the applicant filed in the High Court a draft order nisi and an affidavit sworn on 25 June 2003.  The order nisi claimed prerogative relief in respect of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (‘the Tribunal’) made on 1 June 2000affirming a decision not to grant a protection visa to the applicant and members of his family.  The affidavit in support of the draft order nisi disclosed no basis upon which any prerogative relief could be granted.  On 12 November 2003, the matter was remitted to this Court by Heydon J. 

2                     When the matter was called on for directions today there was no appearance for the applicant.  In the circumstances I propose to refuse an order nisi.  I order the applicant to pay the Minister’s costs. 



I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett.



Associate:


Dated:              27 April 2004



Counsel for the Applicant:

The applicant did not appear



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor



Date of Hearing:

9 February 2004



Date of Judgment:

9 February 2004