FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wride v IP Australia [2004] FCA 282
DONALD CHARLES WRIDE v IP AUSTRALIA
S 176 OF 2002
LANDER J
ADELAIDE
23 MARCH 2004
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY |
S 176 OF 2002 |
|
BETWEEN: |
DONALD CHARLES WRIDE APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
IP AUSTRALIA RESPONDENT
|
|
LANDER J |
|
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
23 MARCH 2004 |
|
WHERE MADE: |
ADELAIDE |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to O 11 r16 the amended statement of claim is struck out.
2. Pursuant to O 20 r2 the applicant’s application is dismissed.
3. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs including the costs ordered by the Full Court to be costs in the cause.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY |
S 176 OF 2002 |
|
BETWEEN: |
DONALD CHARLES WRIDE APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
IP AUSTRALIA RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGE: |
LANDER J |
|
DATE: |
23 MARCH 2004 |
|
PLACE: |
ADELAIDE |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 For the reasons published this day by me in the matter of Wride v Schulze (file number S 175 of 2002), except the reasons contained in paragraphs [48] to [52], I make the following orders:
1. Pursuant to O 11 r 16 the amended statement of claim is struck out.
2. Pursuant to O 20 r 2 the applicant’s application is dismissed.
3. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs including the costs ordered by the Full Court to be costs in the cause
|
I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Lander. |
Associate:
Dated: 23 March 2004
|
Counsel for the Applicant: |
The applicant appeared in person |
|
Counsel for the Respondent: |
Mr B Krupka |
|
Solicitor for the Respondent: |
Australian Government Solicitor |
|
Date of Hearing: |
9 March 2004 |
|
Date of Judgment: |
23 March 2004 |
