FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tanner v Shergold [2004] FCA 176
CORRIGENDUM
LINDSAY TANNER v PETER ROGER SHERGOLD, AS DELEGATE OF PETER KEASTON REITH, MINISTER OF STATE FOR WORKPLACE RELATIONS AND SMALL BUSINESS
V64 OF 1999
MARSHALL J
3 MARCH 2004 (CORRIGENDUM DATED 4 MARCH 2004)
MELBOURNE
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
VICTORIA REGISTRY |
V64 OF 1999 |
|
BETWEEN: |
LINDSAY TANNER APPELLANT
|
|
AND: |
PETER ROGER SHERGOLD, AS DELEGATE OF PETER KEASTON REITH, MINISTER OF STATE RESPONDENT
|
|
MARSHALL J |
|
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
3 MARCH 2004 (CORRIGENDUM DATED 4 MARCH 2004) |
|
WHERE MADE: |
MELBOURNE |
CORRIGENDUM
In the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Marshall on 3 March 2004:
1. The case cited on the front page:
“Shergold v Tanner [2002] FCA 19”
should read:
“Shergold v Tanner [2002] HCA 19”
2. In the last line of paragraph 2, the acronym “FCA” should be deleted and replaced with “HCA”.
|
I certify that this is a true copy of the corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Marshall. |
Associate:
Dated: 4 March 2004
