FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Applicant S1193/2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2003] FCA 1606


APPLICANT S1193/2003 v REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL & ANOR

 

 

N1011 OF 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

EMMETT J

27 OCTOBER 2003

SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N1011 OF 2003

 

BETWEEN:

APPLICANT S1193/2003

APPLICANT

 

AND:

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

FIRST RESPONDENT

 

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

SECOND RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

EMMETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

27 OCTOBER 2003

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.         the application be dismissed;


2.         the applicant pay the second respondent’s costs.


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N1011 OF 2003

 

 

BETWEEN:

APPLICANT S1193/2003

APPLICANT

 

AND:

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

FIRST RESPONDENT

 

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

SECOND RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

EMMETT J

DATE:

27 OCTOBER 2003

PLACE:

SYDNEY



REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                     On 29 May 2003, a draft order nisi and an affidavit in support were filed in the High Court of Australia on behalf of the applicant.  At that stage the applicant was represented by Adrian Joel & Co, solicitors.  The matter was then remitted to this Court.  On 17 October 2003, Adrian Joel & Co withdrew as solicitors for the applicant. 

2                     In the meantime, on 30 June 2003, the applicant requested the second respondent, the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (‘the Minister’), to assist him to depart Australia and, on 8 July 2003, the applicant was removed from Australia.  It is not surprising, therefore, that, when the matter was called today, there was no appearance for the applicant.  The Minister therefore asks that the proceeding be dismissed.  In the circumstances, it is appropriate to accede to that request.

3                     Accordingly, I propose to order that the application be dismissed and that the applicant to pay the Minister’s costs of the proceeding.



I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett.



Associate:


Dated:              22 January 2004



Counsel for the Applicant:

No appearance



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor



Date of Hearing:

27 October 2003



Date of Judgment:

27 October 2003