FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McKenzie v Honourable Peter Slipper MP [2003] FCA 1416
MARK MCKENZIE v THE HONOURABLE PETER SLIPPER MP
S 598 OF 2003
SELWAY J
8 DECEMBER 2003
ADELAIDE
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY |
S 598 OF 2003 |
|
BETWEEN: |
MARK MCKENZIE APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
THE HONOURABLE PETER SLIPPER MP FIRST RESPONDENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA SECOND RESPONDENT
|
|
SELWAY J |
|
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
|
|
WHERE MADE: |
ADELAIDE |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application is dismissed.
2. The applicant to pay the respondents’ costs to be taxed in the absence of agreement.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY |
S 598 OF 2003 |
|
BETWEEN: |
MARK MCKENZIE APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
THE HONOURABLE PETER SLIPPER MP FIRST RESPONDENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA SECOND RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGE: |
SELWAY J |
|
DATE: |
|
|
PLACE: |
ADELAIDE |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 Mr McKenzie, on behalf of the Kuyani people, has instituted proceedings under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) and s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) arguing that the issue of a certificate under s 24 Lands Acquisition Act 1989 (Cth) and the subsequent acquisition of land by the Commonwealth was invalid. For the reasons given in State of South Australia v Honourable Peter Slipper MP [2003] FCA 1414, I am of the view that the proceedings must be dismissed with costs.
|
I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Selway. |
Associate:
Dated: 8 December 2003
|
Counsel for the Applicant: |
J Basten QC with A Tokley and S Ower |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Applicant: |
Corsers Solicitors |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Respondent: |
D Bennett QC with T Howe and P Slattery |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Respondent: |
Australian Government Solicitor |
|
|
|
|
Date of Hearing: |
3, 4 November 2003 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Judgment: |
8 December 2003 |