FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Optus Mobile Pty Limited v Hutchison 3G Australia Pty Limited
[2003] FCA 1243
OPTUS MOBILE PTY LIMITED v HUTCHISON 3G AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
N 724 of 2003
ALLSOP J
7 NOVEMBER 2003
SYDNEY
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY |
N 724 of 2003 |
|
BETWEEN: |
OPTUS MOBILE PTY LIMITED APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
HUTCHISON 3G AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED RESPONDENT
|
|
ALLSOP J |
|
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
7 NOVEMBER 2003 |
|
WHERE MADE: |
SYDNEY |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
- The respondent pay the applicant’s costs of the interlocutory hearing and its preparation.
- The respondent pay one half of the applicant’s costs of the final hearing.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY |
N 724 of 2003 |
|
BETWEEN: |
OPTUS MOBILE PTY LIMITED APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
HUTCHISON 3G AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGE: |
ALLSOP J |
|
DATE: |
7 NOVEMBER 2003 |
|
PLACE: |
SYDNEY |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 On 4 July 2003 and 19 September 2003 I made orders in this matter.
2 In my reasons of 19 September 2003 I indicated at [86] and [87] that I would hear the parties on costs but that I was minded to require the respondent to pay all the costs of the interlocutory hearing and its preparation and one half of the applicant’s costs of the final hearing.
3 The parties filed written submissions in relation to costs. Those submissions will remain with the file.
4 I do not think that any fine distinctions need be made in this case. Nor do I think that the question of costs here involves any question of principle.
5 I am unpersuaded that I should move from my preliminary view expressed on 19 September 2003 for the reasons I then briefly gave. The orders of the Court will be:
- The respondent to pay the applicant’s costs of the interlocutory hearing and its preparation.
- The respondent to pay one half of the applicant’s costs of the final hearing.
|
I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Allsop. |
Associate:
Dated: 7 November 2003
|
Counsel for the Applicant: |
Mr J T Gleeson SC Mr M Darke |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Applicant: |
Minter Ellison |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Respondent: |
Mr S Finch SC Mr R Cobden |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Respondent: |
Allens Arthur Robinson |
|
|
|
|
Date of Hearing: |
19 June 2003 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Judgment: |
7 November 2003 |