Lloyd Harris v Peter Tighe [2003] FCA 738

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

LLOYD HARRIS v PETER TIGHE & ORS

V354 OF 2003

MARSHALL J

22 JULY 2003

MELBOURNE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY	V354 OF 2003

BETWEEN:	LLOYD HARRIS APPLICANT
AND:	PETER TIGHE (and others according to the Schedule of Respondents hereto) RESPONDENTS
JUDGE:	MARSHALL J
DATE OF ORDER:	22 JULY 2003
WHERE MADE:	MELBOURNE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

The rule to show cause granted on 6 May 2003 be discharged.

Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

SCHEDULE OF RESPONDENTS

PETER TIGHE	First Respondent
BERNIE RIORDAN	Second Respondent
JAMES MacFADYEN	Third Respondent
JOHN DORAN	Fourth Respondent
DEAN MIGHELL	Fifth Respondent
RICHARD WILLIAMS	Sixth Respondent
ROBERT GERAGHTY	Seventh Respondent
WILLIAM GAME	Eighth Respondent
EARL SETCHES	NinthRespondent
STEVE McCARNEY	Tenth Respondent
GARY JACOBSEN	Eleventh Respondent
JORGEN GULLESTRUP	Twelfth Respondent
NIGEL LEAN	Thirteenth Respondent
MIKE MITCHELL	Fourteenth Respondent
TONY MURPHY	Fifteenth Respondent
BRIAN O’REILLY	Sixteenth Respondent
JOE GATTO	Seventeenth Respondent
STEVE MASON	Eighteenth Respondent
NOEL PAUL	Nineteenth Respondent
PETER MILLER	Twentieth Respondent
BRIAN BAULK	Twenty-First Respondent
COLIN COOPER	Twenty-Second Respondent
DAVID IRONS	Twenty-Third Respondent
SHARELLE HERRINGTON	Twenty-Fourth Respondent
DEBORAH HARRIS	Twenty-Fifth Respondent
NOEL BRETAG	Twenty-Sixth Respondent
LAURIE CHALKER	Twenty-Seventh Respondent
JIM METCHER	Twenty-Eighth Respondent
IAN McCARTHY	Twenty-Ninth Respondent
VIVETTE HORREX	Thirtieth Respondent
JOHN BROWN	Thirty-First Respondent
BURT BLACKBURNE	Thirty-Second Respondent
DOREEN McDONALD	Thirty-Third Respondent
PAUL WHITE	Thirty-Fourth Respondent
GERRY KANDELAARS	Thirty-Fifth Respondent
PAUL KELLY	Thirty-Sixth Respondent
GARY CARSON	Thirty-Seventh Respondent
BARRY RISELEY	Thirty-Eighth Respondent
DAN DWYER	Thirty-Ninth Respondent
G ROBINS	Fortieth Respondent
L WALKINGTON	Forty-First Respondent
L HARRIS	Forty-Second Respondent

D EVANS	Forty-Third Respondent
L EINFUSS	Forty-Fourth Respondent
M SWAN	Forty-Fifth Respondent
S MASON	Forty-Sixth Respondent
H McMULLAN	Forty-Seventh Respondent
P DOHERTY	Forty-Eighth Respondent
L COOPER	Forty-Ninth Respondent
G RAYNER	Fiftieth Respondent
G ENZON	Fifty-First Respondent
M ETUE	Fifty-Second Respondent
R WILDE	Fifty-Third Respondent
N TAYLOR	Fifty-Fourth Respondent
L BRITAIN	Fifty-Fifth Respondent
S DODD	Fifty-Sixth Respondent
B CLARKE	Fifty-Seventh Respondent
G CUMMING	Fifty-Eighth Respondent
N REID	Fifty-Ninth Respondent
K MELLIS	Sixtieth Respondent
R STEER	Sixty-First Respondent
C THIELE	Sixty-Second Respondent
B DOBSON	Sixty-Third Respondent
N PAUL	Sixty-Fourth Respondent
P McDONALD	Sixty-Fifth Respondent
B WATKINS	Sixty-Sixth Respondent
P MILLER	Sixty-Seventh Respondent
M SUMNER	Sixty-Eighth Respondent
D KENNA	Sixty-Ninth Respondent

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY	V354 OF 2003

BETWEEN:

LLOYD HARRIS

APPLICANT

AND:

PETER TIGHE (and others according to the Schedule of Respondents hereto)

RESPONDENTS

JUDGE:	MARSHALL J
DATE:	22 JULY 2003
PLACE:	MELBOURNE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1 These reasons for judgment should be read together with the reasons for judgment in CEPU v Harris [2003] FCA 737 which was published immediately before the publication of these reasons.

2 The rule to show cause in this matter would have been made absolute but for the validation order made in CEPU v Harris. Consequently it is appropriate to order that the rule to show cause be discharged.

I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Marshall.

Associate:

Dated: 22 July 2003

Counsel for the Applicant:	Mr R Niall

Solicitor for the Applicant:	Holding Redlich

Counsel for the 1^st, 4^th, 6^th, 7^th, 8^th, 13^th, 17^th, 19^th, 20^th, 21^st, 24^th, 25^th, 27^th, 28^th, 31^st, 34^th, 35^th, 36^th, 39^th, 40^th, 47^th, 50th to 66^th and 68^th Respondents:	Mr R Kenzie QC with Ms C Howell

Solicitor for the1^st, 4^th, 6^th, 7^th, 8^th, 13^th, 17^th, 19^th, 20^th, 21^st, 24^th, 25^th, 27^th, 28^th, 31^st, 34^th, 35^th, 36^th, 39^th, 40^th, 47^th, 50th to 66^th and 68^th Respondents:	Slater & Gordon

Date of Hearing:	18 and 19 June 2003

Completion of Written Submissions	7 July 2003

Date of Judgment:	22 July 2003

Top