FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NAAQ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 357



MIGRATION – Appeal from Federal Magistrate – no appearance by appellant – appeal dismissed


NAAQ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

N 139 of 2003

 

 

 

TAMBERLIN J

SYDNEY

17 APRIL 2003



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 139 OF 2003

 

BETWEEN:

NAAQ

APPELLANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

TAMBERLIN J

DATE OF ORDER:

17 APRIL 2003

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.         The appeal is dismissed.

2.         The appellant pay the respondent’s costs.


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 139 OF 2003

 

BETWEEN:

NAAQ

APPELLANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

 

JUDGE:

TAMBERLIN J

DATE:

17 APRIL 2003

PLACE:

SYDNEY


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                     In this matter I am satisfied from the evidence which has been given and also from the communication to the Court which has been repeated in Court today, that this is a case where the appellant was aware of the hearing today and did not wish to attend the Court.  I note that the appellant is in detention.  In these circumstances I consider the appropriate order is that the application should be dismissed and the appellant should pay the costs of the respondents. 

2                     Accordingly, on the ground of failure to appear on the hearing of the appeal which has been listed, notified and of which the appellant was aware, I dismiss the appeal with costs.


 

I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin



Associate:


Dated:              16 May 2003


No appearance by the Appellant.




Counsel for the Respondent:

T Reilly



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Blake Dawson Waldron



Date of Hearing:

17 April 2003



Date of Judgment:

17 April 2003