FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Michigan Group Pty Ltd (ACN 065 378 029) [2002] FCA 1627


AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v MICHIGAN GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 065 378 029), RODNEY MONTAGUE LASKI, CHARLES CAMERON, IMOBILIARE PTY LTD (ACN 063 501 208), PETER SEMOS, GEORGE SEMOS, DARYL FRANCIS DOHERTY, YEPPOON PTY LTD (ACN 081 944 112), LINDA CAROL MORETTO AND PROSPERO FRANZESE

 

Q 105 OF 2000

 

 

 

 

DOWSETT J

20 DECEMBER 2002

BRISBANE


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

Q 105 OF 2000

 

 

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MICHIGAN GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 065 378 029)

FIRST RESPONDENT

 

RODNEY MONTAGUE LASKI

SECOND RESPONDENT

 

CHARLES CAMERON

THIRD RESPONDENT

 

IMOBILIARE PTY LTD (ACN 063 501 208)

FOURTH RESPONDENT

 

PETER SEMOS

FIFTH RESPONDENT

 

GEORGE SEMOS

SIXTH RESPONDENT

 

DARYL FRANCIS DOHERTY

SEVENTH RESPONDENT

 

YEPPOON PTY LTD (ACN 081 944 112)

EIGHTH RESPONDENT

 

LINDA CAROL MORETTO

NINTH RESPONDENT

 

PROSPERO FRANZESE

TENTH RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

DOWSETT J

DATE:

20 DECEMBER 2002

PLACE:

BRISBANE

 

 

 

 

 

CORRIGENDUM

 

 

In the judgment of Justice Dowsett delivered on 20 December 2002, the following amendments are made:


1.                In Orders 1 and 3, where the word “telephone” appears, delete and insert the word “telephonic”;

2.                In Order 5, after the words “declaratory relief”, insert the words “and costs in respect of the second respondent”;

3.                In Order 7, delete any reference to the second respondent;

4.                In par 5 of the reasons for judgment, where the word “telephone” appears, delete and insert the word “telephonic”; and

5.                In par 7 of the reasons for judgement, after the words “declaratory relief”, delete the word “is” and insert the words “and costs in respect of the second respondent are”.



Associate:


Dated:              7 January 2003