FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NAFU v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1199


NAFU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

 

N 309 of 2002

 

 

 

TAMBERLIN J

SYDNEY

20 SEPTEMBER 2002




IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 309 OF 2002

 

BETWEEN:

NAFU

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

TAMBERLIN J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 SEPTEMBER 2002

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.         The application is dismissed.

2.         The applicant pay the respondent’s costs.


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 309 OF 2002

 

BETWEEN:

NAFU

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

 

JUDGE:

TAMBERLIN J

DATE:

20 SEPTEMBER 2002

PLACE:

SYDNEY


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                     In this matter there has been no appearance by the applicant and the material before the Court indicates that he was aware of the hearing to date.  Accordingly, I have been asked by the respondent to make an order under O 32 r 2(1)(c) of the Federal Court Rules (“FCR”) dismissing the proceeding in light of the default of appearance by the applicant.  I make such an order and I direct that the applicant be notified of the making of the order.  I also direct that reference be made to O 35 r 7 of the FCR and a copy of that rule be sent to the applicant with the letter of notification of the orders which I make today. 

2                     Accordingly, I dismiss the application with costs.

 


I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin.


Associate:


Dated:              26 September 2002



No appearance by the Applicant.




Counsel for the Respondent:

M Wigney



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Blake Dawson Waldron



Date of Hearing:

20 September 2002



Date of Judgment:

20 September 2002