FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

 

Michaels v Commonwealth of Australia [2002] FCA 1130

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

edgar michaels v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA & Ors

N 839 of 2001

 

ALLSOP J

13 SEPTEMBER 2002  (Corrigendum 18 September 2002)

SYDNEY

 


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 839 of 2001

 

BETWEEN:

EDGAR MICHAELS

APPLICANT

 

AND:

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

FIRST RESPONDENT

 

AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE

SECOND RESPONDENT

 

NATIONAL CRIME AUTHORITY

THIRD RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

ALLSOP J

DATE OF ORDER:

13 September 2002    (Corrigendum 18 September 2002)

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

 

            CORRIGENDUM TO REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

 

1.                  In line 3 of paragraph 38 on page 16 of the reasons for judgment the word “my” should be removed and be replaced with the word “further”. 


I certify that the preceding paragraph is a true copy of the Corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment of his Honour Justice Allsop


 

Associate:

Dated:              18 September 2002


Counsel for the Applicant

(as amicus curiae):


Dr J Macken



Solicitor appearing for the Respondent:

Mr A Markus



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor



Dates of Hearing:

25 March 2002, 11 September 2002



Date of Judgment:

13 September 2002

(Corrigendum 18 September 2002)

 


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Michaels v Commonwealth of Australia [2002] FCA 1130

 

 

CORRIGENDUM


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

edgar michaels v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA & Ors

N 839 of 2001

 

ALLSOP J

13 SEPTEMBER 2002  (CORRIGENDUM 23 SEPTEMBER 2002)

SYDNEY

 


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 839 of 2001

 

BETWEEN:

EDGAR MICHAELS

APPLICANT

 

AND:

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

FIRST RESPONDENT

 

AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE

SECOND RESPONDENT

 

NATIONAL CRIME AUTHORITY

THIRD RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

ALLSOP J

DATE OF ORDER:

13 September 2002

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

 

            CORRIGENDUM

 

Paragraph 47 on page 20, the sentence beginning “The applicant’s” should read  “The applicant’s present complaint could have formed part of that cross-examination, if there was a foundation for it.”  The italicised word “if” to be inserted and the semi-colon to be replaced by a comma.


I certify that the preceding paragraph is a true copy of the Corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment of his Honour Justice Allsop


 

Associate:

Dated:              23 September 2002