FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Trepper [2002] FCA 1093
LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER SA v EYTAN TREPPER (trading as “BEST SELLERS CLOTHING CO”)
V 342 OF 2000
SUNDBERG J
28 AUGUST 2002
MELBOURNE
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY |
V 342 OF 2000 |
|
BETWEEN: |
LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER SA APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
EYTAN TREPPER (trading as “BEST SELLERS CLOTHING CO”) RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGE: |
SUNDBERG J |
|
DATE: |
28 AUGUST 2002 |
|
PLACE: |
MELBOURNE |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 I am satisfied that the respondent's acceptance that he has committed a contempt of court satisfies the requirement that a contempt be established beyond reasonable doubt. In those circumstances, the only question for me is an appropriate penalty. The amount suggested by both parties is $5000.
2 In the light of the respondent's acceptance of guilt, his apology to the court and to the applicant and the fact that the proposed consent order involves the respondent paying the applicant’s costs of $15,000 (an amount that, as I understand the position, is arrived at on a solicitor‑client basis), I have concluded that a fine of $5000 is appropriate.
3 I add that I would expect Mr Klempfner to convey to his client not only the seriousness with which the Court views the breach he has committed, but that any repetition, whether in respect of these precise goods or any other goods, is likely to be attended by a much greater fine, and indeed may result in punishment not necessarily restricted to a fine.
|
I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Sundberg. |
Associate:
Dated: 4 September 2002
|
Counsel for the Applicant: |
E A Strong |
|
|
|
|
Solicitors for the Applicant: |
Corrs Chambers Westgarth |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Respondent: |
D A Klempfner |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Respondent: |
Michael Rickards |
|
|
|
|
Date of Hearing: |
28 August 2002 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Judgment: |
28 August 2002 |
