FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Barghouthi v Transfield Pty Limited [2002] FCA 666
RAMZI BARGHOUTHI v TRANSFIELD PTY LIMITED
N 1584 OF 2001
HILL J
5 JUNE 2002 (Corrigendum 12 June 2002)
SYDNEY
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
N 1584 OF 2001 |
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
|
BETWEEN: |
APPELLANT
|
|
AND: |
RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGE: |
|
|
DATE: |
|
|
PLACE: |
CORRIGENDUM TO REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 The final sentence of paragraph 25 of the Reasons for Judgment should read “As such, pursuant to s 46PO of the HREOC Act (which enabled the appellant to bring these proceedings to this court), I will order that the respondent pay the appellant the sum equal to 1 weeks salary under the “Project Specific Contract of Employment”.” not “As such, pursuant to s 46PO of the HREOC Act (which enabled the appellant to bring these proceedings to this court), I will order that the respondent pay the appellant the sum equal to 1 weeks salary under the “Project Specific Contract of Employment” and also that the respondent pay the appellant’s costs.”
2 On the page that sets out the orders made by the court and on the first page of the Reasons for Judgment, the words “ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA” should appear in the centre of the page under the line that begins “NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY”.
|
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Corrigendum to Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Hill. |
Associate:
Dated: 12 June 2002
