FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Telstra Corporation Ltd v Hurstville City Council [2002] FCAFC 92
Telstra Corporation Ltd v Hurstville City Council [2002] FCA 385
TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED and TELSTRA MULTIMEDIA PTY LTD v HURSTVILLE CITY COUNCIL, KOGARAH MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, LEICHHARDT MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, PARRAMATTA CITY COUNCIL, PENRITH CITY COUNCIL, RANDWICK CITY COUNCIL, HORNSBY SHIRE COUNCIL, DRUMMOYNE COUNCIL, BURWOOD COUNCIL, CONCORD COUNCIL, STRATHFIELD MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, BAYSIDE CITY COUNCIL, MORELAND CITY COUNCIL, FRANKSTON CITY COUNCIL and YARRA CITY COUNCIL
N 33 OF 2001
OPTUS VISION PTY LIMITED and OPTUS NETWORKS PTY LIMITED v WARRINGAH COUNCIL, RANDWICK CITY COUNCIL, BLACKTOWN CITY COUNCIL and MORELAND CITY COUNCIL
N 92 OF 2001
SUNDBERG and FINKELSTEIN JJ
4 APRIL 2002
MELBOURNE
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
N 33 OF 2001 |
|
BETWEEN: |
TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED (ACN 051 775 556) FIRST APPLICANT
TELSTRA MULTIMEDIA PTY LTD (ACN 069 279 072) SECOND APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
HURSTVILLE CITY COUNCIL FIRST RESPONDENT
KOGARAH MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SECOND RESPONDENT
LEICHHARDT MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THIRD RESPONDENT
PARRAMATTA CITY COUNCIL FOURTH RESPONDENT
PENRITH CITY COUNCIL FIFTH RESPONDENT
RANDWICK CITY COUNCIL SIXTH RESPONDENT
HORNSBY SIRE COUNCIL SEVENTH RESPONDENT
DRUMMOYNE COUNCIL EIGHTH RESPONDENT
BURWOOD COUNCIL NINTH RESPONDENT
CONCORD COUNCIL TENTH RESPONDENT
STRATHFIELD MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ELEVENTH RESPONDENT
BAYSIDE CITY COUNCIL TWELFTH RESPONDENT
MORELAND CITY COUNCIL THIRTEENTH RESPONDENT
FRANKSTON CITY COUNCIL FOURTEENTH RESPONDENT
YARRA CITY COUNCIL FIFTEENTH RESPONDENT
|
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
N 92 OF 2001 |
|
JUDGE: |
|
|
DATE: |
|
|
PLACE: |
CORRIGENDUM
In the Judgment delivered by the Honourable Justice Sundberg and the Honourable Justice Finkelstein on 4 April 2002, the word “1997” should replace the word “1991” after the words “Telecommunications Act” in paragraph 3 of the Orders.
Associate:
Dated: 21 June 2002
