FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Winton Shire Council v Lomas [2002] FCA 288
WINTON SHIRE COUNCIL and THE WALTZING MATILDA CENTRE LIMITED v BRENDA MAURICEEN LOMAS
No. Q 92 of 2000
SPENDER J
BRISBANE
20 MARCH 2002
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
Q 92 OF 200 |
|
BETWEEN: |
WINTON SHIRE COUNCIL FIRST APPLICANT
THE WALTZING MATILDA CENTRE LIMITED SECOND APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
BRENDA MAURICEEN LOMAS RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGE: |
|
|
DATE: |
|
|
PLACE: |
CORRIGENDUM
In the reasons for judgment delivered by Justice Spender on 20 March 2002, the following corrections are made:
In par 48 and par 57, replace “Jolly Swagman” with “Jolly Swagmen”.
The first sentence of par 57 should read: ‘I should note also that the only submission on s 44 of the Act in the written submissions of the applicants is “The goods sought to be registered under the opposed application are similar or closely related goods to the goods sought to be registered under the [Jolly Swagmen] application.”’
13 June 2002 Emma McGrath
Associate to Justice J.E.J. Spender
