FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

E I Dupont de Nemours & Company v Imperial Chemical Industries PLC

[2002] FCA 230

E I DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY v IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC

N1248 OF 1999

E I DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY v IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC AND INEOS FLUOR HOLDINGS LIMITED

N1249 OF 1999

BRANSON J

12 MARCH 2002

SYDNEY

CORRIGENDUM

In the reasons for judgment of Justice Branson published on 12 March 2002:

·          On page 2 of the Catchwords page delete:

“E I DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY v IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC

N1248 OF 1999 and N1249 OF 1999”

and replace with:

“E I DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY v IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC

N1248 OF 1999

E I DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY v IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC AND INEOS FLUOR HOLDINGS LIMITED

N1249 OF 1999”

·          On the Orders page for matter number N1249 of 1999 delete:

“AND:      IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC

                  RESPONDENT”

      and insert:

“AND:      IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC

                  FIRST RESPONDENT

                  INEOS FLUOR HOLDINGS LIMITED

                  SECOND RESPONDENT”

·          On the first page of the Reasons for Judgment delete:

and insert:

·          In paragraph 1 line 4 and paragraph 17 line 4, “respondent” should be replaced with “respondent/s”.

·          Reference to “respondent” in paragraphs 120-152 should be replaced with “respondents”.

·          In paragraph 142 line 2, “concedes” should be replaced with “concede”.

Associate:

Dated:              12 April 2002