FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Universal Music Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2001] FCA 192

AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v UNIVERSAL MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS POLYGRAM PTY LIMITED) & ORS

N 925 OF 1999

AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v WARNER MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED & ORS

N 924 OF 1999

HILL J

SYDNEY

6 March 2002 (Corrigendum 7 March 2002)

CORRIGENDUM TO REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1. On page 3 paragraph 10 (a) of the Short Minutes of Order of N 925 delete “defendant” and insert “respondent”.

2. On page 2 paragraph 3 of the Short Minutes of Order of N 924 should read

“knowingly concerned in the contraventions” not “knowingly concerned the contraventions”.

3. On the covering front page of the reasons for judgment at the bottom insert

the following:

MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS POLYGRAM PTY LIMITED) & ORS

N 925 OF 1999

AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v WARNER MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED & ORS

N 924 OF 1999

HILL J

SYDNEY

6 March 2002

4.      On page 2 of the Short Minutes of Order of N 925 paragraph 5 after

“14 December 2001” insert “and the Reasons for Judgment of the Court dated 6 March 2002.”

5.      On page 2 of the Short Minutes of Order of N 924 paragraph 5 after

“14 December 2001” insert “and the Reasons for Judgment of the Court

dated 6 March 2002.”

      I certify that the preceding paragraphs

      are a true copy of the Corrigendum to

      the Reasons for Judgment of his Honour

      Justice Hill

      Associate:

      Dated: 7 March 2002

      Date of Hearing: 1 February 2002

      Date of Judgment: 6 March 2002 (Corrigendum 7 March 2002)