FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Universal Music Australia Pty Limited [2001] FCA 1800
AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v UNIVERSAL MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS POLYGRAM PTY LIMITED) & ORS
N 925 OF 1999
AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v WARNER MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED & ORS
N 924 OF 1999
HILL J
SYDNEY
14 December 2001 (Corrigendum 7 March 2002)
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
|
|
JUDGE: |
|
|
DATE: |
|
|
PLACE: |
CORRIGENDUM TO REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. On page 138 of the Reasons for Judgment the phrase in paragraph 444 should read “a reaction to the retailer being insolvent” and not “a reaction to the retailer being insolent.”
2. Date of Order of N 925 of 1999 should read “14 December 2001” and not “14 Decemeber 2001”.
3. On page 2 of the catchwords page delete “N925 of 2000” and insert “N925 of 1999”.
4. On page 2 of the catchwords page delete “N924 of 2000” and insert “N924 of 1999”.
I certify that the preceding paragraphs
are a true copy of the Corrigendum to
The Reasons for Judgment of his
His Honour Justice Hill
Associate:
Dated: 7 March 2002
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Universal Music Australia Pty Limited [2001] FCA 1800
AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v UNIVERSAL MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS POLYGRAM PTY LIMITED) & ORS
N 925 OF 1999
AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v WARNER MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED & ORS
N 924 OF 1999
HILL J
SYDNEY
14 December 2001 (Corrigendum 1 October 2002)
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY |
|
|
BETWEEN: |
AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
N 925 OF 1999 UNIVERSAL MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (formerly known as PolyGram Pty Limited) (ACN 000 158 592) FIRST RESPONDENT
SUSAN ELIZABETH COHEN SECOND RESPONDENT
CRAIG HANDLEY THIRD RESPONDENT
PAUL DICKSON FOURTH RESPONDENT
N 924 OF 1999 WARNER MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 000 815 565) FIRST RESPONDENT
GARY SMERDON SECOND RESPONDENT
GREGORY MAKSIMOVIC THIRD RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGE: |
HILL J |
|
DATE: |
14 DECEMBER 2001 |
|
PLACE: |
SYDNEY |
CORRIGENDUM TO REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 In the first sentence of paragraph 78 insert the word “Family” after the word “Lighthouse”.
2 In the second bullet point under the sub-heading “Piracy” in paragraph 85 replace the word “therefor” with “therefore”.
3 In the first bullet point under the sub-heading “Retail Market” in paragraph 85 replace the word “be” with “we”.
4 In last sentence of paragraph 119 replace the words “Mr Whales” with “Mr Whale”.
I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered
paragraphs are a true copy of the Corrigendum
to Reasons for Judgment of his
Honour Justice Hill
Associate:
Dated: 1 October 2002
