FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

 

Wukir v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1449



 

 

 


TRIE WUKIR AND UIRA NABILLA V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

 

N1074 OF 2001

 

MOORE J

4 SEPTEMBER 2001

SYDNEY



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N1074 OF 2001

 

BETWEEN:

TRIE WUKIR AND UIRA NABILLA

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

MOORE

DATE OF ORDER:

4 SEPTEMBER 2001

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.      The application be dismissed.

2.      The applicants pay the respondent’s costs.


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.




IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N1074 OF 2001

 

BETWEEN:

TRIE WUKIR AND UIRA NABILLA

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

 

JUDGE:

MOORE

DATE:

4 SEPTEMBER 2001

PLACE:

SYDNEY


EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

MOORE J:

 

1                     Having regard to the exchange between the applicant and myself and counsel for the Minister and myself it appears that at best this is an application to review a judicially reviewable decision made by the Refugee Review Tribunal on 30 December 1998.  The application was made on 13 July 2001.  It is plainly incompetent.  I suspect, however, that these proceedings were initiated by the applicant in this Court in the hope that this Court may be able to provide her with some comfort about her position in this country and more particularly the position of her young daughter.

 

2                     However, as I have endeavoured to explain it is not my role to make decisions under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) addressing those matters even if the Act provided an opportunity for the applicant and/or her daughter to remain in Australia.  The only course open to me is to order that the application is dismissed and the applicant pay the respondent’s costs and I so order.

 

 


I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Moore.



Associate:


Dated:              17 October 2001


The applicant appeared in person on behalf of herself and her daughter



Counsel for the Respondent:

Dean Jordan



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor



Date of Hearing:

4 September 2001



Date of Judgment:

4 September 2001