FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Khan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1233

 


 


MOHAMMED YOUNUS KHAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

 

N959 of 2001

 

 

 

MADGWICK J

20 AUGUST 2001

SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N959 of 2001

 

BETWEEN:

MOHAMMED YOUNUS KHAN

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

MADGWICK J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 AUGUST 2001

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.                  The application be dismissed.

2.                  The applicant pay the respondent’s costs.



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N959 of 2001

 

BETWEEN:

MOHAMMED YOUNUS KHAN

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

 

JUDGE:

MADGWICK J

DATE:

20 AUGUST 2001

PLACE:

SYDNEY


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(revised from transcript)

HIS HONOUR:

1                     In this matter the applicant seeks the form of judicial review available in this Court in respect of an adverse decision by the Migration Review Tribunal, affirming the decision of a delegate of the respondent Minister refusing him the grant of a “student (temporary) (class TU) visa”.  The applicant has not appeared upon the matter being called for hearing and efforts by my Associate to contact him, on two telephone numbers that he has provided in connection with his application to the court and otherwise, have been unsuccessful.

2                     On the face of it, the submissions filed by counsel for the respondent Minister appear compelling and I see no reason not to invoke the Court’s powers under O 32 r 2(1)(c) of the Federal Court Rules, as the respondent asks that I do.  Accordingly, I dismiss the application with costs.

 

I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Madgwick.


Associate:


Dated:              3 September 2001


No appearance by the Applicant.




Counsel for the Respondent:

R Beech-Jones



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Clayton Utz



Date of Hearing:

20 August 2001



Date of Judgment:

20 August 2001