FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Contact Minerals Pty Ltd v Mineral Providers Australia Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1042


CONTACT MINERALS PTY LIMITED AND MARK ECKERSLEY v

MINERAL PROVIDERS AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED, DOUGLAS KINNON, C & M LABORATORIES INC AND ROBERT A MUSACH

 

N 182 OF 1999

 

 

 

TAMBERLIN J

SYDNEY

3 AUGUST 2001


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N182 OF 1999

 

BETWEEN:

CONTACT MINERALS PTY LIMITED

(080 004 593)

FIRST APPLICANT

 

MARK ECKERSLEY

SECOND APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINERAL PROVIDERS AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED

FIRST RESPONDENT

 

DOUGLAS KINNON

SECOND RESPONDENT

 

C & M LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL INC

THIRD RESPONDENT

 

ROBERT A MUSACH

FOURTH RESPONDENT

 

 

JUDGE:

TAMBERLIN J

DATE:

3 AUGUST 2001

PLACE:

SYDNEY

CORRIGENDUM

 

In paragraph 57, the second sentence should read as follows:

 

It is apparent, especially having regard to the lack of current familiarity with the existing process on the part of Richard, that Tom could reasonably be expected to have been called on the part of the respondents if he could give any useful evidence to support the respondents’ case as to the original site or as to the method of manufacture.


I certify that this is a true copy

of the Corrigendum made to the

reasons for judgment in this matter

of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin.


Associate:                                                                    

Date: 4 September 2001