FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cottrell v Wilcox [2001] FCA 866
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 35A(6), 51(1), 52
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 52(3)
Maintenance, Champerty and Barratry Abolition Act 1993 (NSW) s 6
Federal Court Rules O 20 r 2, 18, 38
Bankruptcy Rules, s 19
Rozenbes v Kronhill (1956) 95 CLR 407 cited
Martin v Commonwealth Bank [2001] FCA 87 applied
Trendtex Trading Corporation v Credit Suisse [1982] AC 679 applied
Martell v Consett Iron Co Ltd [1955] Ch 363 cited
DAVID MERVYN COTTRELL v JOHN ALFRED WILCOX
N 1476 OF 2000
SUNDBERG, EMMETT and FINKELSTEIN JJ
9 JULY 2001
SYDNEY
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
N 1476 OF 2000 |
|
BETWEEN: |
DAVID MERVYN COTTRELL APPELLANT
|
|
AND: |
JOHN ALFRED WILCOX RESPONDENT
|
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
|
|
WHERE MADE: |
CORRIGENDUM TO THE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF SUNDBERG, EMMETT and FINKELSTEIN JJ DELIVERED 9 JULY 2001
1. On the orders page Order 3 should read: “The appeal be allowed”.
2. In paragraph 13 of the reasons for judgment (3) should read: “The appeal be allowed”.
|
I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Sundberg, the Honourable Justice Emmett and the Honourable Justice Finkelstein. |
Associate:
Dated: 24 July 2001
