FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v “Y” [2001] FCA 859



MIGRATION – application for protection visa - decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – whether reasons of Tribunal failed to comply with s 430 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - whether fear of harm from sporadic outbreaks of ethnic or religious violence can constitute persecution - whether error of law by Tribunal affected decision.


MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS v “Y”

V 428 OF 2000

 

BLACK CJ, LEE AND MERKEL JJ

MELBOURNE

6 JULY 2001



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

V 428 OF 2000

 

ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

APPELLANT

 

AND:

"Y"

RESPONDENT

JUDGES:

BLACK CJ, LEE, MERKEL JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

6 JULY 2001

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.      The appeal be allowed.

 

2.      The order of the primary judge be set aside and in lieu thereof the application for review of the Tribunal’s decision be dismissed.

 

 

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

 


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

V 428 OF 2000

 

ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

APPELLANT

 

AND:

"Y"

RESPONDENT

 

JUDGES:

BLACK CJ, LEE, MERKEL JJ

DATE:

6 JULY 2001

PLACE:

MELBOURNE


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

 

THE COURT:

1                     This is an appeal by the appellant (“the Minister”) from orders made by a judge of this Court (North J), which set aside a decision made by the Refugee Review Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) that the respondent not be granted a “protection visa” and which directed that the matter be returned to the Tribunal for re-determination.

2                     The relevant facts and the arguments in the appeal were indistinguishable from those set out in the reasons provided in Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v “X” [2001] FCA 858, contemporaneously with these reasons, the appeals having been heard together.


 

3                     For the reasons set out in Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v “X” the appeal must be allowed, his Honour’s orders set aside and the application for review of the Tribunal’s decision dismissed.

 

 

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Chief Justice Black and Justices Lee and Merkel.

 

 

Associate:

 

Dated:              6 July 2001

 

 

Counsel for the Appellant:

Mr AL Cavanough QC

 

 

Solicitor for the Appellant:

Australian Government Solicitor

 

 

Counsel for the Respondent:

Mr RM Niall

 

 

Solicitor for the Respondent:

Erskine Rodan and Associates

 

 

Date of Hearing:

8 November 2000

 

 

Date of Judgment:

6 July 2001