FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
TCN Channel Nine Pty Limited v Network Ten Limited [2001] FCA 108
TCN CHANNEL NINE PTY LIMITED, QUEENSLAND TELEVISION LIMITED & GENERAL TELEVISION CORPORATION PTY LIMITED v NETWORK TEN PTY LIMITED
N 105 OF 2000
CONTI J
SYDNEY
20 FEBRUARY 2001
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY |
N 105 OF 2000 |
|
BETWEEN: |
TCN CHANNEL NINE PTY LIMITED FIRST APPLICANT
QUEENSLAND TELEVISION LIMITED SECOND APPLICANT
GENERAL TELEVISION CORPORATION PTY LIMITED THIRD APPLICANT
|
|
AND: |
NETWORK TEN PTY LIMITED RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGE: |
CONTI J |
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
20 FEBRUARY 2001 |
|
WHERE MADE: |
SYDNEY |
CORRIGENDA
Paragraph 17: The words “assists an understanding as why parody…” should be changed to read “assists an understanding as to why parody…”.
Paragraph 17: The words “and to have done so in way that…” should be changed to read “and to have done so in a way that…”.
Paragraph 26: The words “Indeed Nine contended that there i involved…” should be changed to read “Indeed Nine contended that there is involved…”.
Paragraph 28: The words “for the reasons that in the absence…” should be changed to read “for the reason that in the absence…”.
Paragraph 29(i) The words “For example, following Nine…” should be changed to read “For example, the following Nine…”.
Paragraph 44: The words “require only the minor qualification”. Should be changed to read “require only minor qualification.”
Paragraph 45: The words “Nationwide News of the notion of quality as Mance LJ…” should be changed to read “Nationwide News of the notion of quality. As Mance LJ…”.
Associate:
Dated: 12 September 2001
